Journal of Kufa legal and political science

For nearly half a century, Iraq has been experiencing a state of political turmoil, internal unrest and external threat, due to the policies of the military regimes that have taken power. From 1958 to 1970, five military coups were launched, under which six temporary constitutions were enacted, which relied on exceptional military institutions (the Sovereignty Council - the National Council for the Leadership of the Revolution - the Revolutionary Command Council) to manage the affairs of the state. Under the constitution and the exceptional temporary institution, it is not possible to talk about participation in power or about the rights and freedoms of individuals under the pretext of exceptional circumstances.

The Jordanian Law of Criminal Procedure did not specify
clearly and explicitly the boundaries that the Court of Appeal is
committed to in its consideration of an appeal case, as did some
Arab laws. On the one hand, the Law gives the Court of Appeal
the right not to comply with the reasons contained in the list of
appeals. On the other, the Law grants the court of appeal the
right to allow the opponents to give new reasons other than those
contained in the list of appeals. On the third, it awards the right
to hear new evidence within certain conditions. The Jordanian
Law enjoins the need to contain clear and specific reasons in the
list of appeals. This research will try to shed light on the
approach of the Jordanian legislature in determining the powers
of the Court of Appeal at the hearing of the dispute before it.
Will it reconsider the case which the Court of First Instance has
already heard? Is the court restricted by the matters and facts to
be heard? Or will it hear the entire case? Is it true that the case is
transferred to the Court of Appeal as it was before deciding by
the Court of First Instance as is the way of the legislature and the
judiciary in some neighboring Arab countries

The phenomenon of missing persons is a common phenomenon that occurs in various countries. We often hear about a plane crash or a ship sinking at sea or the occurrence of natural disasters such as earthquakes or floods. A number of people are victims of these disasters and are counted as missing, especially if their lives are not confirmed due to the lack of evidence to confirm their death. For all of this, the phenomenon of missing persons was not isolated from the law because losing a person in such circumstances may result in a number of damages, whether in relation to his money or to his wife, and therefore must be addressed. Therefore, we note that the Yemeni Personal Status Law regulates the provisions of missing persons in Articles (113 - 120).

The essence of Government accountability In the Iraqi
constitutional system, The Prime Minister and Ministers who
together administer the Executive branch of government are
responsible, to the Parliament for their actions.
In keeping with this concept of responsible government,
members of the Presidency Council, the Prime Minister, his
deputies, the ministers, or leaders of independent commissions,
Persons of special ranks and other government employees
(civilian or in military) and any other official in the Executive
branch, may be called on to explain their administrative actions,
there are several parliamentary mechanisms for achieving
ministerial accountability, one of which is the Parliamentary
questions, that the Iraqi constitution of 2005 has regulated the in
Article (61/7/Ι
) and articles (50-54) of the rules of procedure of
The Council of Representatives 2007.

Due to the scarcity of legal studies that dealt with the analysis and scrutiny of the legal texts regulating the private hospital, and this will appear clearly with our assistance from a very limited number of sources, we found it necessary to stand at the legal system of these hospitals in Iraq, especially since these hospitals began to play an important role in relation to the nature of the services they provide due to the increasing needs for special attention and exceptional health care, in addition to the increasing resort of citizens in general to this type of hospitals. We found it necessary to stand briefly and briefly on the nature of the law that regulates the establishment of these hospitals, especially with the encouragement of the private sector movement and the desire to diversify the services provided by this sector, as well as the existence of many legal legislations in force that address the same issue. For example, in establishing a private hospital, it is possible to rely on the Law of Establishing Private Hospitals No. 25 of 1984, which is considered effective until now, despite the existence of rules that are no longer valid or compatible with the current reality, as well as the existence of Instructions No. 3 of 2001, which contradict the aforementioned law, although it is still in effect, and in addition to referring the aforementioned law to the Public Health Law No. 89 of 1981 to establish the private hospital according to it, despite the many differences in its provisions. In light of all these reasons, we found it our duty as legal researchers to propose a set of solutions to resolve these legal problems, which we will address through a plan.

Power is considered one of the concepts that has an impact and dimension in international relations, whether during the Cold War or after the Cold War, as during the Cold War, there was a race to build a military arsenal, whether conventional or unconventional, between the two giant blocs, the United States of America and the former Soviet Union. As for after the Cold War, the concept of power has changed relatively, as power is the ability of the economy and the possession of technology, knowledge and reliability, especially after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the rise of economic countries that have an impact on the United States. Therefore, priority was given to the economy more than military power.

The crime of theft “ is a misappropriation of a moveable
money owned by anon –offender deliberately …(i.e for owning)
so any theft crime requires the availability of the following 1- a
movable money in addition to its being owned for other 2- a
partially responsible person to act on a misappropriation of this
moveable money. 3- the misappropriation action must be for
owning of the embezzling money.
The phone has touched on the scientific objectivity of this
crime, as it was addressed to the concept of the crime of stealing
the phone and found us by searching What is the phone line, and
what are the ways by which they can steal your phone, whether
fixed or mobile, and touched Search also steal the phone line and
the theft of scratch cards (balance).

" To appeal" is considered away of re-judgment when the
convict has the right to ask for another trial if the legal
conditions do exist (cheating, forgery, false Testimony and new
evidences). The main reason behind allowing for another trial,
maybe, lies in the possibility of the wrong judgement that the
judges may make in the first place. According to the above in
troduction and in order to cover the topic of "Appeal", I derided
this paper into three parts. The first part talks about the nature of
the re-trial which includes two requirements: the firs one is to
clarify this concept while the second is about the zone of this
concept.