TIKRIT UNIVERSITY JOURNAL FOR RIGHTS

The testimony is evidence of the evidence referred to by the Iraqi law and is considered a legally accepted means used by the parties to the conflict to convince the judge of the veracity of the facts they claim.
If the testimony alone is sufficient to resolve the dispute, consider the evidence to be complete and resolve the case before the court, but if the testimony is incomplete and unable on its own to resolve the dispute before the judiciary and convince the court of its authority, it is incomplete and the dispute cannot be resolved in this way except by completing its authority by the judiciary by completing this deficiency, which is based on the authority or authority granted to the court to indicate and direct the litigants, which shows the positive role of the civil judiciary and the discretion of the dispute.

: The International Court of Justice is the only judicial organ of the United Nations, which, by virtue of its Charter, conferred jurisdiction over the settlement of disputes in order to avoid the use of force in international relations and to achieve the highest goals of the United Nations, namely, the maintenance of international peace and security.
However, the developments imposed by the new international order, as well as the legislative limitations of the Charter of the United Nations with respect to its advisory competence, have rendered it ineffective in the peaceful settlement of international disputes.
The failure of the Charter of the United Nations not to authorize the International Court of Justice to monitor the decisions of the organs of the United Nations, particularly the Security Council, has caused a crisis of international legitimacy.
In order to acquaint ourselves with this study with some importance, we have divided it into three demands. First, we shed light on the concept of consultative jurisdiction, and then show how to develop consultative jurisdiction in the latter. The latter is in the jurisprudential consolidation of the International Court of Justice's oversight of the legitimacy of UN Security Council resolutions.

Abstract: The legal regulation of the procedures for waiving the trial in the civil case is one of the important procedural means that the legislator has omitted from enacting integrated legal texts that simplifies those civil procedures that the litigants can use when the trial is abandoned in the civil case. The lawsuit shall have the right to waive and sue this lawsuit before a competent court again. The Iraqi legislator did not know the assignment and did not distinguish it from any other legal systems that might mix it, nor did he determine those legal procedures that the litigants answer their behavior upon the assignment. Trial procedures in a civil