Journal of Al Imam Al-Adham University College

The right of defense is a natural right permanently connected to constitutional rights the
goal of the right of defense and its main goal is to achieve justice. The right of defense benefits
the accused، as the accused is the most worthy of the parties to the case to benefit from the
right to defend himself by himself in order to refute all the accusation attributed to him، as
the competent authorities must enable the accused to defend on his own behalf informing
the accused of the charges against him، and for the competent authorities to review the case
papers so that the accused can present defenses and requests to defend himself. The right
of defense is not limited to criminal obstacles only، but includes every penalty that has a
punitive nature، and that the right to defense is one of the rights guaranteed constitutionally،
as most of it stipulated .Constitutions and that the right of defense in general administrative
penalties is one of the procedural guarantees to ensure the correctness، and that failure to
observe the right of defense affects the procedures and therefore the decision of the general
administrative penalty if it becomes defective.

The Qur’aan has been and continues to be the subject of interest to Muslims, honorable
companions, scholars, and researchers. It is a great book whose wonders never end. We have
examined a portion of this great book in our research entitled (The Root Fajr and its Trials
between Linguistic Rooting and Qur’anic Use).
The research came in four sections, each section had two topics, The First section: the
root (Fajr) and the second (Fajr) in Qur’anic usage.
The Second section (Faraj): It contains two topics, the first is the linguistic rooting of
(Faraj) and the other is (Faraj) in Qur’anic usage.
The Third section: (Rajaf): It contains topic, the first is
The linguistic roots of “Rajaf” and the other “Rajaf” in Qur’anic usage.
The Fourth topic: (Jurf) It contains two topics. The first is the linguistic root of the word
(Jurf) in Qur’anic usage.

Previously، the role of the judge in lawsuits in general was almost negative and non-existent،
as it was limited to ruling between the parties without interfering between them in
any way، but the development in the concept of civil lawsuit and administrative lawsuit in
particular and looking at the judiciary and the judgments it issues from a different angle as
achieving interest In general، in addition to the special interest of the litigants، the judge
was given a positive and distinct role in this case from others، so several trends emerged
calling for this role to be given to the judge with a different reason according to the point of
view adopted by its owners، indicating the philosophical basis for this role according to the
arguments they relied on.

The issuance of the judgment by the judiciary and its acquisition of the authority of the
thing decided by it leads to the exit of the dispute from the jurisdiction of the judiciary and
giving the administration the right to implement and empowering the convict with his right,
and there is no doubt that the administration’s refusal to implement the judgments is nothing
but a violation of the prestige of the judiciary and a loss of confidence in it, as it leads to The
frustration of individuals in facing the arbitrariness of the administration, and that all these
reasons prompted the French Council of State to use several means to urge the administration
to implement administrative rulings, as these means are represented by warning, counseling,
and interpretation of the ruling, which are called friendly means, but these means, although
they are effective in ensuring implementation Judicial rulings, however, remain a friendly
method free from pressure and coercion on the administration, and it can bear fruit in the
event of good intentions of the administration, but if the administration is of bad faith, there
is nothing to compel it to implement, and here it is necessary to search for other means that
are more effective than friendly means to implement the ruling This prompted the French
legislator to legislate Law No. (539/80) issued on 7/16/1980, according to which the administrative
judge was granted the authority to impose and impose a threatening fine on the
administration that refused to implement the administrative rulings issued against it in the
text of Article 8 thereof. Non-implementation of a judgment issued by the administrative
judiciary The French Council of State can automatically impose a threatening fine against
legal persons to ensure the implementation of the judgment. Orders of the administration,
and I also admit to those courts the possibility of imposing a threatening fine on the administration
to ensure the implementation of the judgments issued against it, which are the focus
of our research.

The research aims to show the importance of the Taoist religion and its beliefs among the
Japanese people and the extent to which they are affected by it. There are more than a billion
Indians who owe this religion to their beliefs and the origins of their religion that they inherited
from their fathers and grandfathers, as well as their previous civilization, which is a group of
beliefs and traditions that were formed through a long march from the fifteenth century before
Birth to the present time, and it is not affiliated with a specific founder personally, but was
formed over many centuries. One of its direct origins is the historical Veda religion since the
Iron Ages, and therefore it is often called the oldest living religion in the world. During the
succession of historical eras, Hinduism developed; By being influenced by six religious and
philosophical schools, it contributed to the establishment of the Hindu religious culture. Words
Key (the concept of Taoism, sacred places, sources of legislation).

The research seeks to highlight a number of critical issues in the book, and highlight the
extent to which Ibn Tabataba’s critical opinions agree with its application and with the spirit
of the times in which we live amidst a renewed concept of creativity. The research is divided
into two sections: the first section deals with the function and criteria of poetry, while
the second section deals with the issue of craftsmanship, poetic memory, and the impact of
memory on criticism. The research ends with results that reinforce the non-application of the
poet’s caliber of his critical stances.

One of the grammatical issues that the grammarians dealt with was the question of exclamation
from the triple verb (Nasr), which corresponds to the exclamation Formula (what
I do), so in this issue Sheikh Abdullah bin Muhammad Bin Wali Al-qayujaqi (d.1123 Ah)
wrote an important letter in which he explained the doctrines of the grammarians in it, so this
research came as a study and in order to achieve this important message and its subject, the
researcher divided the work into two parts, the first of which was to translate the author and
the second section to realize the text of the manuscript letter.

The Moriscos lived in Spain and they represented an authentic element of Spanish society
and considered everything Spanish except for what contradicts Islamic law as part of the
components of their culture. He was going as far as declaring that had it not been for the fear
of the Inquisition, many Christians would have converted to Islam. It was the share of the
Moriscos to live in this era after the collapse of Islamic rule in Andalusia in 1492 AD, which
is the last period of Andalusian Islam, i.e. at a time when this Islam in Spain was living in
an era of decline and weakness. The Moriscos represented a serious and deadly threat to the
Spaniards, as they considered them spies, conspirators, and allies of all the external enemies
of Spain. A traitor, and this does not mean that the Spaniards, when the decision to expel
the Muslims was issued in 1609 AD, were exposed to a clear threat because of the presence
of the Moriscos