Abstract
In this study, a method for skull stripping referred to as the 3D Enhanced
Residual U-Net is introduced. The approach combines the traditional U-Net
with an enhancement mechanism designed to improve both the effectiveness
and processing speed of the U-Net. An anisotropic diffusion filter (ADF)
reduces noise in MRI images while maintaining the edges of present objects.
This is accompanied by skull stripping to eliminate non-brain matter and
contrast enhancement to elevate the visual quality. The architectural
adaptations allow for rapid and stable training. As brain images vary
significantly from subject to subject, a deep learning approach will account for
these differences leading to consistent skull stripping results. Neurofeedback
Skull Stripping (NFBS) dataset was used for the proposed model formulation.
The results from the experiments show that the proposed approach is effective
and practical compared to previous methods. This method obtained an
impressive sensitivity rate of 0.9974, DSC of 1.0000, a specificity of 0.9983, an
IOU of 0.9831, an accuracy percentage of 0.9969, and a precision of 0.9961,
showing an actual ability to differentiate the distinct parts of the brain and
the skull.
Residual U-Net is introduced. The approach combines the traditional U-Net
with an enhancement mechanism designed to improve both the effectiveness
and processing speed of the U-Net. An anisotropic diffusion filter (ADF)
reduces noise in MRI images while maintaining the edges of present objects.
This is accompanied by skull stripping to eliminate non-brain matter and
contrast enhancement to elevate the visual quality. The architectural
adaptations allow for rapid and stable training. As brain images vary
significantly from subject to subject, a deep learning approach will account for
these differences leading to consistent skull stripping results. Neurofeedback
Skull Stripping (NFBS) dataset was used for the proposed model formulation.
The results from the experiments show that the proposed approach is effective
and practical compared to previous methods. This method obtained an
impressive sensitivity rate of 0.9974, DSC of 1.0000, a specificity of 0.9983, an
IOU of 0.9831, an accuracy percentage of 0.9969, and a precision of 0.9961,
showing an actual ability to differentiate the distinct parts of the brain and
the skull.
Keywords
RGVlcCBsZWFybmluZ9mIIE1lZGljYWwgSW1hZ2XZiCBTa3VsbCBzdHJpcHBpbmfZiCBNUknZiCBSZXNpZHVhbCB1bml0c9mIIE5GQlMgZGF0YXNldNmIIFUtTmV0