Abstract
bBackground: The assessment of childhood asthma severity is important for the diagnosis and
determining the initial level or step of the treatment of childhood asthma. It can be performed
either by history alone for children less than five years old or by history and pulmonary
function test for older children.
Objective: to evaluate and compare the utility of history and lung function test in the
assessment of asthma severity in children
Patients and Method: Across-sectional study was conducted in Karbala teaching hospital of
pediatrics, during the period from October 1, 2013 - April 30, 2014. The study included 50
children of both genders diagnosed with asthma (diagnosis made by consultant pediatrician).
A questionnaire was designed for the assessment of asthma severity by history which
included symptoms frequency over the preceding 4 weeks respectively. The lung function
test was only done in children 6-year-old and more. All children in our study had performed
lung function test.
Results: The mean age of studied group was 9.6 ± 2.5. The result of asthma severity
assessment based on history was as follow: 14/50 patients (28%) had intermittent asthma,
36/50 (72%) had persistent asthma of different degrees, mild in 11/50 (22%), moderate in
19/50 (38%) and severe persistent asthma in 6/50 (12%). While according to lung function
test, 12/50 patients (24%) had intermittent asthma, 15/50 (30%) had mild persistent, 19/50
(38%) had moderate persistent and the remaining 4/50 patients (8%) had severe persistent
asthma. There was no significant statistical difference in severity assessment between the two
methods (P > 0.05).
Conclusions: Our study shows good correlation between history and lung function test
regarding classification of childhood asthma severity. History is an excellent tool for the
assessment of childhood asthma severity when lung functions test is unavailable or difficult
to be done in younger children.
determining the initial level or step of the treatment of childhood asthma. It can be performed
either by history alone for children less than five years old or by history and pulmonary
function test for older children.
Objective: to evaluate and compare the utility of history and lung function test in the
assessment of asthma severity in children
Patients and Method: Across-sectional study was conducted in Karbala teaching hospital of
pediatrics, during the period from October 1, 2013 - April 30, 2014. The study included 50
children of both genders diagnosed with asthma (diagnosis made by consultant pediatrician).
A questionnaire was designed for the assessment of asthma severity by history which
included symptoms frequency over the preceding 4 weeks respectively. The lung function
test was only done in children 6-year-old and more. All children in our study had performed
lung function test.
Results: The mean age of studied group was 9.6 ± 2.5. The result of asthma severity
assessment based on history was as follow: 14/50 patients (28%) had intermittent asthma,
36/50 (72%) had persistent asthma of different degrees, mild in 11/50 (22%), moderate in
19/50 (38%) and severe persistent asthma in 6/50 (12%). While according to lung function
test, 12/50 patients (24%) had intermittent asthma, 15/50 (30%) had mild persistent, 19/50
(38%) had moderate persistent and the remaining 4/50 patients (8%) had severe persistent
asthma. There was no significant statistical difference in severity assessment between the two
methods (P > 0.05).
Conclusions: Our study shows good correlation between history and lung function test
regarding classification of childhood asthma severity. History is an excellent tool for the
assessment of childhood asthma severity when lung functions test is unavailable or difficult
to be done in younger children.