Al-Muhaqqiq Journal

Research hypothesis: The research starts from a major assumption that the Qur’anic discourse is a (Value) discourse, which can be employed (the Value system); to re-read (the abrogation) – alleged- in the Qur'an.
The implication of this matter is that the Qur’anic discourse is copious of values, and in other words, the sum of its letters represents a set of values, which put them forward in a special way; and the punishment was inflicted against those who violate them, in order to achieve human, intellectual, societal and mental security. If we contemplate the humanitarian values in the verses allegedly abrogated, we would find in that the Qur’an set a letter to handle the punishment against those who violated those values, but it excluded those of them who repented. The ruling remained in effect against those who did not repent, and it was removed from those of them who repented. This is a specification, or a reduction of the circle of the ruling, not abrogation as it is claimed, or it was a term for the forerunners, and perhaps those who came after them followed their path; but it is not from the act of abrogation.

This research deals with the effect of the abrogating and abrogated in the interpretational preferences of the scholars of Hilla, after it was found that there is no sufficient evidence to determine the amount of abrogation in the Holy Qur’an, except in some resources, and this indicates that the issue is in dispute among the commentators, and the Scientists of Hilla had a clear impact on the interest in abrogation Qur’an and its definition and weighting between the explanatory statements that have been subjected to abrogation and criticize it. And we show that there is a difference in the number of abrogated in the Holy Qur’an by the Holy Qur’an, and Scientists of Hilla have a specific insight at identifying the abrogated with definitive evidence such as unanimity and the frequent text, given that the abrogated is like the Qur’an. Considering that the Qur’anic text is definitive, it is abrogated only by a definitive one.
The research explained - in its three demands - that the preponderance of the scholars of al-Hilla with abrogation was based on the statements of the commentators and the most famous saying of abrogation and consider whether it was abrogated or not.

Consensus is one of the proofs of deduction that has been discussed and disputed for a long time. Ibn Idris al-Hilli believed that the evidence for deduction is limited to definitive evidence that bequeaths knowledge, but -unlike other fundamentalists- he viewed Consensus as the definitive evidence, and it is a disproof if it was revealing the saying of the infallible, and his detective was connotative and moderating, and even considered in some source the strongest evidence and giving it among all other evidence, which led to his adherence to it in sources that no one else has said.

This research aims to clarify the meaning of verbal appending, which indicates the advent of a verb after a verb, according to one of the articulate Arab poets Ibn Al-Arandas Al-Hilli, as well as the effect of other clues such as context, adverb clues, denominator, and others in meaning and the semantics of appending (tandem, rectify, synonym, and sequence), and that the grammarians used it in the sense of subsequent subordination in their writings.
The verbal appending came in Lamiat poem; to accomplish verbs with coordinated and interrelated semantic assumptions that indicate questioning, appeal, praise, affirmation and exaggeration, as well as connotations of renewal and occurrence. And that the shift in the actual forms led to the phenomenon of permutation of speech and the multiplicity of semantic aspects, and the poet used some appending verbs based on the passive, which is one of the important methods that Arabian was inclined to without the imbalance in meaning, and the appending in interrelated verbs is a type of propriety necessitated that and only those who He has the experience and knowledge of rhetoric and eloquence methods. There is no doubt that Ibn Al-Arandas Al-Hilli was the one who was well-versed in the language, grammar and rhetoric, so his Lamiat poem was full of all kinds of grammatical methods and rhetorical arts that had an impact on the immortality of this poem.

Al-Zainiyah School is one of the monuments of the city of Hilla, as the lesson in it dated from the ninth century AH to the eleventh century (803 AH to 1052 AH), and we can call it (Al-Hilla intellectual University) in that mentioned period. And because of the importance of this school and its position in reviving the heritage of the Hilli Hawza, and explaining the scholarly efforts of its figures; I wrote this research, and divided it into two sections. In the first section, I gave an overview of the Al-Zainiyah school, the term school in the Helli heritage, and the figures of the Al-Zainiyah school. As for the second section, I have titled it (Manuscripts Written in Al-Zainiyah School), in which I counted thirty-five manuscripts that were copied in this School by different scribes, with an accurate description of them.

Spoken-Hilla School got basic changes as a result of its influence on the investigator Nasir al-Din al-Tusi (D. 672 AH) and his students and companions in the seventh century AH. The science of common theology was mixed with the rules and foundations of Greek philosophy, and a modern philosophical theological trend emerged from among other scientific trends, and it lasted for several centuries.
The reactions that followed these changes are the subject of this research, which was based on historical reports and analysis, and on information about the scientific currents of the tenth and eleventh centuries, and concluded that multiple and different reactions were found to the speech innovations of Al-Hilah estate, the most important of which were initiated during Al-Najaf estate after al-Maqdis al-Ardabili (d. 99 AH) culminating in the time of Mohammed Amin Al-Estrabadi (A1023H).
Al-Istrabadi’s scientific efforts were based on confronting the innovations of Hillah estate on three branches: Hadith, jurisprudence and Theology. He strongly contradicted the theological philosophical method in deduction from theological research, explaining, proving and defending it, and criticized the mixing of theology with the rules and origins of Greek philosophy.

This research focuses on the study of the character of Al-Sheikh Pride of Investigators, a religious figure who was somewhat vague in mentioning his biography in the books of biographies, and did not give rise to what the first characters bore, even though he gained the lead of Al-Hilli estate at that time, we found no scientific traces, and a clear biography, as his father has.
Therefore, this research aimed to highlight this long-standing ambiguity of his social life, and to mention something of it, and what was said about it in the books of biographies, and made it into two parts: the first was about the pride of investigators' life, his scientific trips, and his death. The other set out the most important descriptions of this religious figure provided by the owners of the biographies.

Taking care of the scientific heritage of our figures and spreading it, is an urgent necessity, and scholars and researchers should take care of and pay more attention to it. Due to the great inherited this heritage involves which serves the science and religion. Among them is the belief message of Sheikh Ibn Fahad Al-Hilli (d. 841 A.H.) called: (Aqeed in Theology). Sheikh Ibn Fahad Al-Hilli divided his treatise into five components, based on the division of the origins of beliefs; I mean monotheism, justice, prophecy, imamate, and resurrection.
I have conducted this lonely version of this thesis, and I have made an effort to do so, relying on important sources.

This is a letter in response to the objections to Shi'a in the matter of Imamah, and it was written by the author in response to questions and objections to the twelfth Imamiyah directed by one of the noble princes of the Hijaz, that the author answered him without keeping a copy to himself then he wrote them which are in our hands now.
This letter deals with the issue of conflict between Imamiyah and Ziyadiyah, since Sharif al-Hijazi is Twelver Shiite. We do not know the author of this letter, but it is likely that he might be the investigator Al-Hilli. Because it was included in the collection of his letters; or is associated with him, there is no reference to it in his list of writings, it is attributed to him.
This letter is kept in the Holy Shrine of Razavi Library, in a series of letters to the Investigator Al-Hilli. We made an effort to investigate it, and we added the word "imam" to the title.