Kufa Journal of Arts

1

Mortada Muzaffar Sahar Al Kaabi, Qasim Matar Abdul Khalidi, Salman Maghames Aboud

Pages: 677-702 Arabic

Ali Abbas Ali Al-Yousefi

Pages: 545-572 Arabic

Full Text Issues

Abstract

The current research aims to identify academic justice among university professors from the point of view of their female students, and to identify the differences in academic justice among university professors according to the academic specialization (scientific-human), and to identify the differences in academic justice among university professors according to the variable of the academic stage (second, fourth), and the sample was selected using a stratified random method with proportional distribution, and to achieve the objectives of the current research, the researcher prepared a scale to know the academic justice of the university professor, as the research community consisted of female students in the (second and fourth) stages and from the (scientific and human) specializations in the College of Education for Girls, where the research sample was selected and amounted to (310) female students, to apply the academic justice scale, which consists of (35) paragraphs, the apparent validity and reliability were extracted by retesting the scale, and the researcher used many statistical methods, namely the t-test for one sample, the t-test for two independent samples, and the researcher concluded that there is a high level of academic justice among university professors, and the results also indicated the existence of statistically significant differences at the significance level (0.05) is attributed to the variable of human specialization, and there are also no statistically significant differences at the level of (0.05) according to the academic stage (second, fourth), and in light of the research results, the researcher presented a set of recommendations and proposals.

Abstract

هدف البحث الحالي التعرف على العدالة الاكاديمية لدى الاستاذ الجامعي من وجهة نظر طالباته، والتعرف على الفروق في العدالة الاكاديمية لدى الاستاذ الجامعي على وفق التخصص الدراسي (العلمي-الإنساني)، والتعرف على الفروق في العدالة الاكاديمية لدى الاستاذ الجامعي على وفق متغير المرحلة الدراسية (الثانية، الرابعة)، وتم اختيار العينة بالطريقة الطبقية العشوائية ذات التوزيع المتناسب, ولتحقيق أهداف البحث الحالي قام الباحث بأعداد مقياس لمعرفة العدالة الاكاديمية للأستاذ الجامعي ,اذ تكون مجتمع البحث من طالبات المرحلة(الثانية والرابعة) ومن التخصصات(العلمية والانسانية) في كلية التربية للبنات, حيث تم اختيار عينة البحث وبلغت (310) طالبة, لتطبيق مقياس العدالة الاكاديمية والذي يتكون من (35) فقرة, تم استخراج الصدق الظاهري والثبات بطريقة أعادة الاختبار للمقياس , واستخدم الباحث العديد من الوسائل الاحصائية وهي الاختبار التائي لعينة واحدة, الاختبار التائي لعينتين مستقلتين، وتوصل الباحث الى وجود مستوى عال من العدالة الاكاديمية لدى الاستاذ الجامعي, وايضا اشارت النتائج الى وجود فروق ذات دلالة احصائية عند مستوى دلالة (0,05) تعزى الى متغير التخصص الإنساني، وايضا لا توجد فروق ذات دلالة احصائية عند مستوى (0,05) على وفق المرحلة الدراسية(الثانية، الرابعة)،وفي ضوء نتائج البحث قدم الباحث مجموعة من التوصيات والمقترحات.

Keywords

الكلمات المفتاحية: الجامعي

10

The Responsibility of the Incapacitated in the Jurisprudence of the Two Schools of Thought - An Applied Study

Azadeh Ayman Abdullah, Abdullah Habeby, Abdul Bari Javanmardzadeh

Pages: 573-598 Arabic

Full Text Issues

Abstract

In Islamic law, the incapacitated person is the one who has been prevented from disposing of his property. The reasons that justify the civil liability of the incapacitated person in Islamic jurisprudence and law and emphasize the necessity of compensation for it are mostly expressed in the form of jurisprudential rules, including: “the rule of guarantee, the rule of pride, the rule of loss and causation, and the rule of non-harm.” However, before that, the scope of incapacity and its reasons must be determined. According to the Imami jurists, the reasons for incapacity are: young age, foolishness, insanity, fatal illness, bankruptcy, etc. They differ slightly from the jurisprudence of the four schools of thought, as Abu Hanifa does not consider foolishness a reason for incapacity, and the Hanbalis, in addition to the previous reasons, consider the wife completely incapacitated from owning more than a third. To remove the incapacity, the Imami jurists considered the conditions of maturity and growth necessary, and the Imami and Sunni jurists agreed on this issue, but Al-Shafi’i considers growth to be a reform of ownership and religion. This research aims to conduct a comparative study of the views of Sunni and Shiite scholars on the liability of incapacitated persons. The information was collected and analyzed in a descriptive and analytical manner. The results concluded that there is a common theory regarding the responsibility of the incapacitated among the five schools of thought (Hanafi, Shafi’i, Maliki, Hanbali, and Ja’fari Shia) in general, and there is only disagreement in the details and in some cases, which led to disagreement in religious rulings.

Abstract

Pages: 495-522 Arabic

Full Text Issues

Abstract

The study dealt with the theory of
dialogical imperative, and this theory
is one of the most important theories
in deliberations, which sees that the
dialogue between people is subject to
controls and limitations that cannot be
transgressed by the human being
Explanation of dialogue between
people. If two people engage in
dialogue, then they negotiate within a
principle called the principle of
cooperation. But if this principle is
violated and departs from these rules,
then it requires things that the
recipient or listener seeks to
understand what came out of it and
these rules and this departure or
requirement is called dialogic
imperative; If we look at it, i.e., at this
requirement, then it is considered one
of the mechanisms of discourse
production. But if we come to the
Hasani discourse, which in turn is one
of the landmarks that provide us with
diverse and different sciences in terms
of discourse and related sciences that
can be extracted in general in all
sciences; In linguistic studies in
particular, this is on the part of the
discourse, which carries with it
meanings that are clear to the
recipient; As for the addressee and the
advantages he enjoys, including his
skill in communicating the multiple
and varied meanings; If we apply the
dialogue imperative in the imam\'s
sermons, we find that it carries several
requirements

Abstract

تناولت الدراسة نظرية الاستلزام الحواري وهذه النظرية تعد من اهم النظريات في التداوليات والتي ترى ان الحوار القائم بين الناس يخضع الى ضوابط ومحددات لا يمكن ان يتعداها الانسان وهذه الضوابط وضعها الفيلسوف الامريكي بول كرايس ضمن قواعد سماها (مبدا التعاون) والذي يكون خاضعا لهذا المبدأ ، ويمكن بيان الحوار بين الناس فاذا ما تحاور اثنان فانهما يتحاوران ضمن مبدا يسمى مبدا التعاون اما اذا خرق هذا المبدأ وخرج عن هذه القواعد فانه يستلزم اشياء يبحث عنها المتلقي او المستمع لكي يفهم ما خرجت منه وهذه القواعد وهذا الخروج او المستلزم يسمى بـ(الاستلزام الحواري) ؛ و اذا نظرنا اليه اي الى هذا الاستلزام فهو يعد آلية من اليات انتاج الخطاب، واما اذا جئنا الى الخطاب الحسني والذي يعد بدوره معلما من المعالم التي ترفدنا بالعلوم المتنوعة والمختلفة من حيث الخطاب وما يتعلق به من علوم يمكن استخراجها بصورة عامة في كافة العلوم ؛ وفي الدراسات اللغوية بصورة خاصة هذا من جهة الخطاب والذي يحمل في طياته المعاني التي تكون واضحة الى المتلقي ؛ أما المخاطب وما يتمتع به من مزايا منها براعته في ايصال المعاني المتعددة والمتنوعة ؛ فاذا ما قمنا بتطبيق الاستلزام الحواري في خطب الامام نجدها تحمل عدة استلزامات.

Keywords

الكلمات المفتاحية: الإستلزام الحواري، الإمام الحسن، بول كرايس، الخطاب، المتلقي

Articles in This Issue

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords