Iraqi Journal Of Political Science

One of the important political terms that had an impact and resonated in the foreign policy of the United States of America at the end of the twentieth century until now is the term rogue state, as it relied on it as a strategy that the Reagan administration followed, and more than that of the former President George W. Bush\'s son who was often dealing with the concept in his speech The political goal is to establish American hegemony in the world and to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries, especially those who oppose US policy, taking advantage of the rogue state to categorize it as you wish from countries under the pretext of not respecting human rights or working to spread weapons of mass destruction and not spreading democracy and others as countries outside of international law. As for the academic concept of the rogue state, it means every country that does not respect the principles, customs and rules of international law and sees itself outside the law or is less than the law and not respecting international humanitarian law. These indicators of the rogue state apply to all countries, even America, which is the clearest credibility of the rogue state as indicated by that thinker American Noam Chomsky. So we have shown in this research the concept of the rogue state in general, the American concept of the rogue state, how it was used in American foreign policy, how the American political discourse dealt with the concept, and how American thought touched on the concept.

After the attacks of September 11, 2001, the United States of America deliberately launched a fierce and multi-directional war against several countries, including Iraq and Afghanistan, calling them a war on terror, and it is proven that the word war is used to describe those attacks as not spontaneous, please. On the use of the same word in order to arrange important, specific and intended legal effects, in order to exclude the principle of the impermissibility of interference in the internal affairs of states, and also to prevent adherence to the principle of the prohibition of resorting to force in international relations, and at the same time supports the interpretation of the United States of America of international provisions regulating the use of force and gives an explanation Broadly that would justify "the war on terror."

The 2015-2030 Sustainable Development Agenda was adopted by the 193 member states of the United Nations. The expansion of the scope and ambition of the new agenda requires a revitalized global partnership to ensure its implementation. It is a global call to work to improve life opportunities in all its aspects for all peoples of the world, by achieving seventeen development goals, and the means required to achieve them. The problem of the study revolves around the relationship between the Covid-19 pandemic and ways to achieve the sustainable development goals, and its significant impact on the path to achieving these goals.

The research aims to provide a vision of the causes of the crisis in the relations between the United States and Iran, during the era of President Donald Trump, that is, during the period between 2017-2020, given the importance that this crisis ends with, and what repercussions it may result from, on the regional environment, And Iraq is part of them, which has been affected by the reactions of the crisis, or the administration by the crisis, which the two countries often resort to in dealing with their crises, as has been evident in the past years.

On October 23، 2020 AD، the American President (Donald Trump) announced in a telephone conversation with the Sudanese Prime Minister (Abdullah Hamdok)، the Chairman of the Transitional Sovereignty Council، Lieutenant General (Abdel Fattah al-Burhan) and the Israeli Prime Minister (Benjamin Netanyahu) about Sudanese normalization. "Israeli" officially، and it represents a step in the right direction to make lasting peace in the Middle East، after similar agreements were made between "Israel" on the one hand and the Emirates and Bahrain on the other hand، and the two sides actually agreed to start economic and commercial relations between Khartoum and Tel Aviv، with great emphasis In the coming period on the agricultural side.

The experience of South Korea is one of the most successful experiences in the developing world and at all levels, as it was able to advance its backward reality to an advanced and advanced reality in a short period of time by employing all capabilities and resources and developing ambitious strategies and plans by the responsible authorities, and the political elites had a great role that could not be ignored. In the process of reform and development, whether positively or negatively, directly or indirectly, according to each of the stages that South Korea has gone through, it has demonstrated that political will, peaceful and long-term planning and good use of resources, and above all that the starting point of self and critical development of local values, and culture enabled it From undertaking many political and administrative reforms that greatly contributed to the development of the country

This research came to confirm the privileged position the African continent occupies in the political, economic and strategic thinking of the "Israeli" decision-maker, as "Israel" had motives to move within the African continent, given the internationalism that it was suffering from at the political, security and economic level. Those motives made The African continent is of great importance in the external "Israeli" orientation, given the continent's proximity to the Arab world, as well as its abundance of primary resources, its large markets, as well as its need for financial support and technical assistance. According to this importance, the "Israeli" - African relations studied. – (Sudan as a model.(