Abstract
Purpose of Study: To examine the roughness of slots of three
ceramic brackets. Materials and Methods: Three ceramic
bracket types (Encore, Reflections and Inspire ICE). The
bottom of each slot of every bracket was selected for
evaluation and pictures were taken by optical microscopy at
magnification (20x) for a general estimation of the roughness.
Then the roughness parameters (Sa, Sq, St, Sz) of every slot
were examined in a 3D optical profilometer in a higher
magnification. Results: The picture from Optical microscope
gave a differences of textural morphology of brackets slots for
tested brackets. Metallic slots gave differences of grooves and
striations whereas plastic slots presented peaks and pits.
Inspire ICE showed the highest Sa and Sq value, statistically
higher than the other brackets tested. Reflections gave the
highest Sz and St values, which were statistically significant
higher than the other brackets, followed by Inspire ICE which
presented statistically significant higher values compared to
Encore. Conclusions:
The significant differences were
revealed through 3D-images and roughness parameters of
slots gives significantly different among the tested bracket.
Encore and exhibited low roughness parameters.
ceramic brackets. Materials and Methods: Three ceramic
bracket types (Encore, Reflections and Inspire ICE). The
bottom of each slot of every bracket was selected for
evaluation and pictures were taken by optical microscopy at
magnification (20x) for a general estimation of the roughness.
Then the roughness parameters (Sa, Sq, St, Sz) of every slot
were examined in a 3D optical profilometer in a higher
magnification. Results: The picture from Optical microscope
gave a differences of textural morphology of brackets slots for
tested brackets. Metallic slots gave differences of grooves and
striations whereas plastic slots presented peaks and pits.
Inspire ICE showed the highest Sa and Sq value, statistically
higher than the other brackets tested. Reflections gave the
highest Sz and St values, which were statistically significant
higher than the other brackets, followed by Inspire ICE which
presented statistically significant higher values compared to
Encore. Conclusions:
The significant differences were
revealed through 3D-images and roughness parameters of
slots gives significantly different among the tested bracket.
Encore and exhibited low roughness parameters.
Keywords
Orthodontic ceramic brackets
roughness par
Keywords
Orthodontic ceramic brackets
roughness par