Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Traditionally, most of anesthesiologists in Iraq evaluate the degree of neuromuscular blockade
during and after anesthesia using clinical criteria alone, which are inaccurate to assess adequate
recovery from neuromuscular block (NMB) which is essential for the patient to have full control of
pharyngeal and respiratory muscles. Fade cannot be detected reliably with a peripheral nerve
stimulator (PNS) at a TOF ratio > 0.4. The time gap between losses of visual fade by using a PNS
until objective TOF ratio has returned to > 0.90 can be considered “the potentially unsafe period of
recovery.”
OBJECTIVE:
To compare between assessment of subjective clinical, subjective TOF by peripheral nerve
stimulation (PNS), and objective TOF by acceleromyography (AMG) before reversal of
neuromuscular blockade
PATIENT AND METHOD:
A prospective clinical trial of one hundred females who underwent caesarian section under general
anesthesia. Standard anesthesia was conducted for all patients. Giving of neuromuscular reversal
was decided by the anesthesia care providers depending on clinical criteria, at that time, TOF
measured by 2 ways, 1st: counting the twitches visually (principal of PNS), and 2nd: the device
showing the TOF reading objectively (principal of AMG).
RESULT:
Comparisons between subjective criteria and objective AMG T4\T1 ratios revealed no statistical
significance (P > 0.05) in all comparisons (except that with the moving limb and lift the head). The
association and consistency of subjective criteria and visual PNS was insignificant differences in
all comparisons. There was wide discrepancy between objective reading and the visual PNS.
CONCLUSION:
The moving limbs and sustained lift head 5 seconds clinical criteria were correlated to TOF. Other
criteria (protruding tongue, respiratory effort, and swallowing reflex) were not correlated to TOF.
Objective AMG more sensitive to detect the fourth twitch than the subjective PNS.
Traditionally, most of anesthesiologists in Iraq evaluate the degree of neuromuscular blockade
during and after anesthesia using clinical criteria alone, which are inaccurate to assess adequate
recovery from neuromuscular block (NMB) which is essential for the patient to have full control of
pharyngeal and respiratory muscles. Fade cannot be detected reliably with a peripheral nerve
stimulator (PNS) at a TOF ratio > 0.4. The time gap between losses of visual fade by using a PNS
until objective TOF ratio has returned to > 0.90 can be considered “the potentially unsafe period of
recovery.”
OBJECTIVE:
To compare between assessment of subjective clinical, subjective TOF by peripheral nerve
stimulation (PNS), and objective TOF by acceleromyography (AMG) before reversal of
neuromuscular blockade
PATIENT AND METHOD:
A prospective clinical trial of one hundred females who underwent caesarian section under general
anesthesia. Standard anesthesia was conducted for all patients. Giving of neuromuscular reversal
was decided by the anesthesia care providers depending on clinical criteria, at that time, TOF
measured by 2 ways, 1st: counting the twitches visually (principal of PNS), and 2nd: the device
showing the TOF reading objectively (principal of AMG).
RESULT:
Comparisons between subjective criteria and objective AMG T4\T1 ratios revealed no statistical
significance (P > 0.05) in all comparisons (except that with the moving limb and lift the head). The
association and consistency of subjective criteria and visual PNS was insignificant differences in
all comparisons. There was wide discrepancy between objective reading and the visual PNS.
CONCLUSION:
The moving limbs and sustained lift head 5 seconds clinical criteria were correlated to TOF. Other
criteria (protruding tongue, respiratory effort, and swallowing reflex) were not correlated to TOF.
Objective AMG more sensitive to detect the fourth twitch than the subjective PNS.
Keywords
peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS).
train of four (TOF)