Abstract
This study deals with investigates the simplification ideas of Al-Jawary and Al-Makhzoomy. I stated the ideas of both, with measurements and comparisons between what they presented about simplified ideas.
My study depends on a descriptive method, from one hand, and an analytical comparative one, on the other.
This study is of a preface and four investigations, and a conclusion. And because cases of simplification before Al-Jawary and Al-Makhzoomy were existing, I dealt, in my preface, with the beginnings of simplifications, prior to them,
The first investigation is titled The Idea of Simplification between Al-Jawary and Al-Makhzoomy, and the second is entitled syntax and the subject, the third is entitled the sentence, while the fourth is entitled the verb.
My conclusion involves
1) the idea of simplification as seen by Al-Jawary, is more restricted than it is seen by Al-Makhzoomy.
2) Al-Jawary considers syntax more characteristic than specifications of simplification, while Al-Makhzoomy considers studying (sentence) is worth to be uttered for simplification.
3) Al-Jawary's dealing is less extensive than Al-Makhzoom's dealing.
4) Al-Jawary links all analyses, interpretations when simplifying the grammatical thought, with meanings of syntax without mentioning convincing This study deals with investigates the simplification ideas of Al-Jawary and Al-Makhzoomy. I stated the ideas of both, with measurements and comparisons between what they presented about simplified ideas.
My study depends on a descriptive method, from one hand, and an analytical comparative one, on the other.
This study is of a preface and four investigations, and a conclusion. And because cases of simplification before Al-Jawary and Al-Makhzoomy were existing, I dealt, in my preface, with the beginnings of simplifications, prior to them,
The first investigation is titled The Idea of Simplification between Al-Jawary and Al-Makhzoomy, and the second is entitled syntax and the subject, the third is entitled the sentence, while the fourth is entitled the verb.
My conclusion involves
1) the idea of simplification as seen by Al-Jawary, is more restricted than it is seen by Al-Makhzoomy.
2) Al-Jawary considers syntax more characteristic than specifications of simplification, while Al-Makhzoomy considers studying (sentence) is worth to be uttered for simplification.
3) Al-Jawary's dealing is less extensive than Al-Makhzoom's dealing.
4) Al-Jawary links all analyses, interpretations when simplifying the grammatical thought, with meanings of syntax without mentioning convincing linguistic interpretation, while Al-Makhzoomy concentrates on meaning of syntax with further additions as linguistic interpretations.
My study depends on a descriptive method, from one hand, and an analytical comparative one, on the other.
This study is of a preface and four investigations, and a conclusion. And because cases of simplification before Al-Jawary and Al-Makhzoomy were existing, I dealt, in my preface, with the beginnings of simplifications, prior to them,
The first investigation is titled The Idea of Simplification between Al-Jawary and Al-Makhzoomy, and the second is entitled syntax and the subject, the third is entitled the sentence, while the fourth is entitled the verb.
My conclusion involves
1) the idea of simplification as seen by Al-Jawary, is more restricted than it is seen by Al-Makhzoomy.
2) Al-Jawary considers syntax more characteristic than specifications of simplification, while Al-Makhzoomy considers studying (sentence) is worth to be uttered for simplification.
3) Al-Jawary's dealing is less extensive than Al-Makhzoom's dealing.
4) Al-Jawary links all analyses, interpretations when simplifying the grammatical thought, with meanings of syntax without mentioning convincing This study deals with investigates the simplification ideas of Al-Jawary and Al-Makhzoomy. I stated the ideas of both, with measurements and comparisons between what they presented about simplified ideas.
My study depends on a descriptive method, from one hand, and an analytical comparative one, on the other.
This study is of a preface and four investigations, and a conclusion. And because cases of simplification before Al-Jawary and Al-Makhzoomy were existing, I dealt, in my preface, with the beginnings of simplifications, prior to them,
The first investigation is titled The Idea of Simplification between Al-Jawary and Al-Makhzoomy, and the second is entitled syntax and the subject, the third is entitled the sentence, while the fourth is entitled the verb.
My conclusion involves
1) the idea of simplification as seen by Al-Jawary, is more restricted than it is seen by Al-Makhzoomy.
2) Al-Jawary considers syntax more characteristic than specifications of simplification, while Al-Makhzoomy considers studying (sentence) is worth to be uttered for simplification.
3) Al-Jawary's dealing is less extensive than Al-Makhzoom's dealing.
4) Al-Jawary links all analyses, interpretations when simplifying the grammatical thought, with meanings of syntax without mentioning convincing linguistic interpretation, while Al-Makhzoomy concentrates on meaning of syntax with further additions as linguistic interpretations.
Keywords
فكرة التيسير عند الجواري والمخزومي، الاعراب والعامل، الجملة، الفعل