Linguistic Papers

Modularity is based on an analytical conception of the cognitive system based on the hypothesis of its functionally divisible feature. This conception has a procedural benefit. It would facilitate the understanding of complex cognitive activities, such that the activity of writing, reading or arithmetic, for example, is better understood if it is divided into functional subsystems, each of which forms a component called a unit. Thus, a system can be described as a group of interrelated units, each of which is defined by specific methods that control its functioning.
The modular theory has two methodological and cognitive benefits. From a methodological point of view, the approach with an analytical procedure that dismantles its subject matter must be followed by a compositional procedure. Thus, the theoretical model should allow the development of sub-theories limited to limited areas. Thus, it is possible to reach greater accuracy in analyzing the details, on the one hand. On the other hand, the model should provide a general framework for integrating those sub-theories that function as systems/units into a single organic system. In this way - from the cognitive point of view, by taking the systemic perception as a framework, we preserve the general perception that is very important in understanding the studied phenomena and facts

Making argumentative premises starting points in which the assumptions, facts, values, and positions are compatible with the hermeneutical results that the poet aims to reach and consolidate in realities by which he organizes his perceptions. The meaning and the world depends on ways to achieve these premises in form and content.
The principle of choosing starting points (the common wellknown) so that there is no conflict between the two sides of the speaking arguments and the specific or universal addressee. This principle was manifested in the strong presence of the lexical field of the position that presented previously, and Al-Mutanabbi succeeded in this poem, and in almost all of his poems, to make the linguistic tributary a central tributary that makes his claims a proof and his metaphors a statement with which to argue and through which he infers.
The compatibility of the argument with its field and scope, creates in the recipient a kind of mental harmony and positional compatibility, as it strengthens the inside of the receiver’s submission, and this is what the poet wanted to convey, and this leads us to the idea of arguments with his starting points that Perelman presented has roots in the heritage, but it lacks study, compilation and re-reading Within a curriculum that allows it to come up with a new solution, and with modern cognitive tools, as Perelman did with Aristotle's rhetoric.

The research aims to adopt a pragmatics approach to Personal Deixis in "Majma' Al-Bayan Fi Tafsir Al-Quran," one of the most famous blogs in its field. The research will also present the strategies and mechanisms employed by Al-Tabarsi to uncover the references of Personal Deixis in the Quran. It is worth mentioning that discussions of ambiguities occupy a wide space in Tafsirs, particularly the reference of pronouns, which constitutes an important research topic for all exegetes. As will be discussed, even the knowledge of the conditions of the pronoun and its references is considered an essential requirement for the exegete. The pragmatists' interest in pronouns was not less than the interest of the interpreters in them, as the topics of the indicative elements, especially Personal Deixis, have taken a prominent place in contemporary pragmatics lesson.

The problems of the linguistic invasion which income to the Arabic language lie in the fact that it reaches people's lives, education centres, and media platforms before it reaches the Arabic language itself and its scientific academies.
In light of the civilizational development that we are living through, which requires Arab awareness to keep pace with this development. This awareness must lie primarily in the change that guarantees linguistic development not in linguistic corruption.
As a result, and in the eyes of the people of the Arabic language, this precedence of the problems of the linguistic invasion makes the Arabic language lag behind foreign languages. In addition, they think that the Arabic language does not meet their aspirations and needs. The reason is that the Arabic language is closed in a specific historical crucible. It does not be allowed to escape from it, and expand its mechanisms; to carry out its renewable functions.
In our view, these problems are due in their entirety to (Linguistic Globalization) whose sources we cannot completely dry up. Also, we do not have the right to select the useful and beneficial ones.
According to the foregoing, two contradictory trends emerged in the life of the contemporary Arabic language: a trend towards (linguistic exclusivity) and a trend towards (linguistic diversity).
These two trends justify the researcher to direct the study to the network of linguistic diversities in the Arab countries; The effects of these diversities on the development of the contemporary Arabic language lexicon can be invested in the globalization of the Arabic language, as this network is becoming more flourishing in keeping with civilizational development whenever the learner moves from the position of: (linguistic uniqueness) to the position of: (linguistic diversity).

The main research problem is related to the idea of the ancient and modern academic debate on the issue of studying the spoken Arabic dialects in those who do not see their legitimacy unless it is a vertical study in the sense of looking at them as an extension of the classical, and not as parallel languages to them, in contrast to those who call for the study of modern spoken dialects In all cases, as languages independent of Standard Arabic, modern Arabic dialects, in their opinion, are different from Standard Arabic grammatically, morphologically, and phonetically, which means that the modern spoken dialect represents the mother tongue realistically, and through it it is possible to identify the social life of its speakers, hence the usefulness of studying it and researching its linguistic details and socially It is appropriate here to say that the spoken Arabic dialects are not confined to the scope of the Arab countries only, but that there is a presence for these dialects in a circle wider than that geographical extension that exceeds some regions of Turkey, Iran and others, and in the research there are samples of dialectal studies outside the Arab world, which are of the same Academic language, written mostly in English.

I paved the way to talk about the first most prominent historical studies emphasizing the use of grammatical terms, with the prior credit for that, and I stood in it on a number of linguistic issues related to the grammatical term, including:
-Concept.
-Accuracy of meaning.
-Pronunciation brief.
-The modernity of the term.
Then I researched the nominal grammatical terms of Al-Farra, and those who followed him from the famous Kufic grammarians, and those who accompanied and followed them, including: Tha’lab, Abu Jaafar Al-Nahhas, and Abu Bakr Al-Anba Al-Ray from the Kufics, and I traced the use of grammatical terms chronologically according to IbnKisan, Al-Farsi, Al-Zajji, and Ibn Genie, all the way to Makki bin AbiTalib al-Qaisi of the Baghdadis, in order to find a relationship of influence and influence between the aforementioned grammarians and those who preceded them, and to determine the differentiation between them, taking into account the extent of the concept of the term in language and terminology for all grammarians, and I stood on the following most prominent issues:
The multiplicity of the term, and its diversity is the appearance of simplification, complexity, and confusion in the concept.
Semantic guidance of the grammatical term used by grammarians with a clear, unified concept.
- Making the change through deletion, creation, increase or decrease.... It may be fixed or changing in each decade or more....
They are attempts that pour into grammatical thought, perhaps benefiting its students, and God Almighty is the Guardian of Success.

Al-Wasail Al-Shia is a comprehensive book of the hadiths of Ahl al-Bayt (peace be upon them), which were distinguished by eloquent words, solemn meanings, gentle indications, and consistent phrases.
After looking closely at these hadiths, the researcher found a grammatical material that deserves standing and study, and the researcher wanted to show or reveal how the infallible employed the grammatical meanings in the past verbs. Peace), but came to denote connotations and purposes that do not come from the structure of familiar sentences and the basis, but rather reached through knowledge of the grammatical meanings and existing patterns.
Likewise, the past reaction in the speech of the infallible (peace be upon him) was in the form of the recent past, and it indicated affirmation and investigation, as well as indicating future events with the intention of defining their occurrence.