Abstract
This study explores the healing effects of nanosilica extracted from date palm on
second-degree burns in white rats, comparing its efficacy with that of silicone gel, a
commonly used treatment for burn injuries, and a control group that received no treatment. A
total of 30 white rats were randomly divided into three groups, with each group consisting of
10 animals. The first group was treated with a 5% nanosilica, the second group received a
topical application of silicone gel (Scarmed®
), and the third group served as a control and
received no treatment. All treatments were applied once daily for 7 days.
The healing process was evaluated macroscopically and microscopically at 7, 14, and
21days post-treatment. The nanosilica-treated group showed accelerated wound healing,
faster re-epithelialization, reduced inflammation, and minimal scarring compared to both the
silicone gel-treated and control groups. The silicone gel-treated group showed moderate
improvement in wound healing but lagged behind the nanosilica group, while the control
group exhibited the slowest healing, with prolonged inflammation, less organized collagen
deposition, and noticeable scarring.
Histological examinations revealed enhanced collagen deposition, fibroblast activity, and
tissue regeneration in the nanosilica-treated wounds, which were significantly better than
those observed in the other two groups. These findings indicate that nanosilica, with its
biocompatibility and regenerative properties, holds great promise as a natural, effective
treatment for burn injuries, offering a viable alternative to traditional silicone-based
treatments.
second-degree burns in white rats, comparing its efficacy with that of silicone gel, a
commonly used treatment for burn injuries, and a control group that received no treatment. A
total of 30 white rats were randomly divided into three groups, with each group consisting of
10 animals. The first group was treated with a 5% nanosilica, the second group received a
topical application of silicone gel (Scarmed®
), and the third group served as a control and
received no treatment. All treatments were applied once daily for 7 days.
The healing process was evaluated macroscopically and microscopically at 7, 14, and
21days post-treatment. The nanosilica-treated group showed accelerated wound healing,
faster re-epithelialization, reduced inflammation, and minimal scarring compared to both the
silicone gel-treated and control groups. The silicone gel-treated group showed moderate
improvement in wound healing but lagged behind the nanosilica group, while the control
group exhibited the slowest healing, with prolonged inflammation, less organized collagen
deposition, and noticeable scarring.
Histological examinations revealed enhanced collagen deposition, fibroblast activity, and
tissue regeneration in the nanosilica-treated wounds, which were significantly better than
those observed in the other two groups. These findings indicate that nanosilica, with its
biocompatibility and regenerative properties, holds great promise as a natural, effective
treatment for burn injuries, offering a viable alternative to traditional silicone-based
treatments.
Keywords
Burn
cutaneous
healing
nanoparticles
Nanosilica
silicone gel