AL-MUBEEN

The meant research paper is to reconnoiter the first attempts to eliminate the mention of the Imam Ali prior to documenting the prophetic chronicle and its drastic impact on the Islamic mind and reverts into histological and modern sources to prove the desired goals.
The most salient vantage point it culminates in is that the policy takes the initiative from the first days of the prophet decease and disseminates the seed of dissention in the Islamic thought system ever since it has been run into being and defaces the portrait of Islam, casts chasm between Muslims and cafirizes each other, that is why the kafirization mind prevails and takes seizure over the Islamic life in various ages.

Abstract
Imam Ali, the commander of the believers, culls many a meritorious niche and a sublime pinnacle; he is the one who speaks on behalf of His prophet and granted peerless and countless deeds that emanate from his efforts, sacrifice and firm faith. That propagates opponents beyond limitation steering all their sinews to demolish his elevated niche via two isles:
- Fabricating deeds to the companions equal to his virtues or attributing his virtues to someone else.
- Underestimating and belittling the deeds and achievements of the Imam Ali (Peace be upon him).
The study exerts itself to manifest these two machinations through choosing examples from the narratives from the prophet battles and then explicating them from documentation to mere text with reference to the reasons beyond the elimination to the Imam from his meritorious deeds in line with the historical scientific research approaches.

Abstract
The current research paper pontificates about the biographical text, narrative and recorded in specialized sources or other, passing, in general, through several stages and varying in terms of amount and style, expansion and brevity, as it is reproduced due conditions of the common and the marginalized. Consequently, it loses much of its truth and role in shaping history. The common, here, designate political, ideological and intellectual authority emanating from Alsaqefa event and its repercussions; Umayyads and the sons of Abbas who take hold of power over the ages, yet the marginalized do the approach intellectual, religious and philosophical and behavioral held by Imam Ali (Peace be upon him and his posterity ), it is the common who desire to obliterate the marginalized at all costs.
The study tackles such a discrepancy through the word “marginalization” varied practically in the chronicle text; sometimes it is manipulated by the narrator as Ziad Bakaie, one of the narrators of Ibn Ashak chronicle, prevented Hisham from narrating some events as an example, or sometimes the author himself, as Ibn Ishaq, did not mention the migration events of the prophet family with Imam Ali, sometimes for elegancy as Ibn Hisham skips some news, narratives and poems in the Ibn Ishaq chronicle.
Ultimately, the research study reverts into mechanisms of comparison, explication and analysis in the narrative text to have the major conclusions.

Abstract
For each a pillar there should be sensual sources the specialists revert into, they are the pure fount providing such specialists with the correct rules and successful applications in a meant knowledge field.
Imam Ali has been one of the genuine sources of the Islamic mind in the knowledge fields the present paper endeavours to shed light on his contributions in erecting sciences: linguistic, theology, Quranic sciences, syntactic and eloquence sciences and relies heavily on the speeches of the Imam, Quranic Ayahs and historical and literary texts.

Abstract
The current research pauper is considered as a pass key to the science of utterances in The Road of Eloquence as it delves into the utterances fraught with various complicated denotations, manipulates the Alnoor utterance as a practical nonpareil in The Road of Eloquence and drives the contextual devices to the perception and the explication of the texts.
The research paper pertains to the science of denotation and connotation, the most prominent source of The Road of Eloquences , as deemed , for it elucidates parts of The Road of Eloquence by The Road of Eloquence itself.

Abstract
The present research study gives importance to specific historical texts pertinent to the martyrdom of the believers commander Imam Ali (Peace be upon him) and tackles the reasons of the martyrdom, the accomplices and the texts illustrating the sword that assassinates him and other concomitant events of his will and the stance of his family.

Abstract
Such a study endeavours to expose the functions of the parallel structure devices in the The Road of Eloquence .For it is a rhymed stylistic phenomenon taking so great a role in forming the rhyme features of literary texts.
Moreover, it rises to existence as a prominent pattern iterated in most sermons of The Road of Eloquence; as there are phonetic units dominating the atmosphere in the context; from structure to rhyme to cast stylistic sublimity and semantic intensions a text purports.
The actual study inaugurates an introduction defining the parallelism and its nexus to the Arabic eloquence and arts, then there are three axes, the first manipulates the structural parallelism in three loci; parallelism via conscience, parallelism via interrogation and parallelism via conditions, yet the second does the contrastive parallelism; the third does the syntactic parallelism, last the study concludes with the most important findings.

Abstract
The Keystone of research is to study the nature of Argumentation wich is contained in the sermon of Imam Ali (As) named (Jihad speech) It is one of the Nahj sermons. We tried to touch the Argumentation of Imam Ali with his companions defeatists for influential Jihad. Who are preferred to rest with humiliation and shame.
The Argumentation is a structure based on architecture language used for the purpose of rhetorical deliberative persuasive idea of what has found clearly in this sermon, there are five types of argumentation (the argument of causality where we find that Imam links the consequences of things with their causes so what happened and got because they leave Jihad so he is argued they made a statement bounty and the consequences of leaving).(comparison arguments Imam Ali makes a comparsion between their dispersed although they are rights with their enemies who are united although they are void).
(Facts arguments) which are based on the convictions of up scale in its correctness supported by reason and logic).(There is also videntiary arguments which is based inference statements precedented alert them to the disastrous results from their leaving of Jihad).(Dialogic arguments which is based on argumentation of the orbit time).