Nasaq

after completing my first research (The Problem of Syntactic Interpretation in the Chapter on Conflict), I found the door to work worthy of this research. Between the two chapters is an argument of interpretation and appreciation of an implicit or omitted factor before it was mentioned, according to the claim of the grammarians. The idea of the worker working with a pronoun that is presumed, presumptive, and preceding him casts its shadows, just as the dispute over a wide door that grammarians called the door of preoccupation. To re-examine and scrutinize the idea with a new reading that stands on the truth of this section; For the minds are infertile, and the strays of ideas are the prey of those who are interested in the lesson. Which awakened me to research it and reach a satisfactory conclusion from it