Abstract
This study experimentally investigated Free-Fall Gravity Drainage (FFGD) under
combination-drive conditions in a two-dimensional Hele-Shaw model representing a water
drive reservoir. An initially high gravity potential from the oil column enabled early oil
drainage before aquifer support became dominant. Three water-drive strengths were tested,
demonstrating that a stronger aquifer (1.15 psig) accelerated oil recovery to approximately
75% of the original oil in place (OOIP) within 60 minutes, resulting in a final recovery of
79.5%. However, this was accompanied by rapid water breakthrough after 2.5 minutes and
high-water cuts exceeding 90%. In contrast, a weaker aquifer (0.725 psig) stabilized the oil
water contact, delaying water encroachment and maintaining zero water cut throughout 240
minutes, albeit with a lower ultimate recovery of 70.2%. Visual observations confirmed that
a stable water crest and oil bank were preserved longer under moderate to weak aquifer
pressures, extending the gravity-dominated recovery and reducing water handling
requirements. Residual oil saturation was higher under weak aquifer support (27.9%) than
stronger water drive (16.8%) due to a loss of gravity potential as the oil column declined
and limited aquifer support. A comparative experiment in a heterogeneous system revealed
approximately 22% lower ultimate recovery and water breakthrough within 5 minutes,
attributed to heterogeneity promoting preferential flow, poor sweep efficiency, and early
breakthrough. In contrast, the homogeneous system sustained production with no water
breakthrough for 300 minutes. These insights strengthen the understanding of gravity
drainage and can help guide enhanced oil recovery strategies in water-drive reservoirs.
combination-drive conditions in a two-dimensional Hele-Shaw model representing a water
drive reservoir. An initially high gravity potential from the oil column enabled early oil
drainage before aquifer support became dominant. Three water-drive strengths were tested,
demonstrating that a stronger aquifer (1.15 psig) accelerated oil recovery to approximately
75% of the original oil in place (OOIP) within 60 minutes, resulting in a final recovery of
79.5%. However, this was accompanied by rapid water breakthrough after 2.5 minutes and
high-water cuts exceeding 90%. In contrast, a weaker aquifer (0.725 psig) stabilized the oil
water contact, delaying water encroachment and maintaining zero water cut throughout 240
minutes, albeit with a lower ultimate recovery of 70.2%. Visual observations confirmed that
a stable water crest and oil bank were preserved longer under moderate to weak aquifer
pressures, extending the gravity-dominated recovery and reducing water handling
requirements. Residual oil saturation was higher under weak aquifer support (27.9%) than
stronger water drive (16.8%) due to a loss of gravity potential as the oil column declined
and limited aquifer support. A comparative experiment in a heterogeneous system revealed
approximately 22% lower ultimate recovery and water breakthrough within 5 minutes,
attributed to heterogeneity promoting preferential flow, poor sweep efficiency, and early
breakthrough. In contrast, the homogeneous system sustained production with no water
breakthrough for 300 minutes. These insights strengthen the understanding of gravity
drainage and can help guide enhanced oil recovery strategies in water-drive reservoirs.
Keywords
Aquifer strength
Combination drive
Free-fall gravity drainage (FFGD)
Hele-shaw model.
Oil recovery