TASLEEM JOURNAL

The current research study tackles a semantic study of the utterances al-Asmā’ (The Names) and al-Kalimāt (The Words) in Glorious Quran by tracing their occurrences in various Quranic contexts and analyzing their linguistic, exegetical, and theological significations. The research depends on the hypothesis that the morphological variations between singular and plural forms, and the use of definite and indefinite articles, are not arbitrary; rather, they involve profound semantic purposes that contribute to the construction of Quranic meaning.
The study is divided into two sections: the first is dedicated to the semantics of the term al-Asmā’, particularly in the ayats of Adam (peace be upon him), while discussing the significance of the definite article (al-), the nature of these names, and their association with the exegetical view that identifies them as the names of the Prophets and the Ahl al-Bayt (peace be upon them). The second section examines the term al-Kalimāt, demonstrating that it is not confined to literal verbal meaning but may refer to existential and spiritual manifestations, such as the description of certain Prophets as the "Words of Allah”.
Employing an inductive-analytical methodology , referencing lexicons and works of Exegesis, the research seeks to uncover the nuances of Quranic usage and their role in broadening the semantic horizons of the text. It concludes that "Names" and "Words" in Quran carry cognitive and theological dimensions transcending apparent linguistic meaning, confirming the coherence of the semantic system in the Quranic discourse and the precision of its lexical selection in accordance with purposeful objectives.

This research examines a hadith of the Prophet (peace be upon him and his progeny) on the state of the Ummah in the end of times in : "The nations will likely be summoned to attack you..."). The study employs three critical approaches—rhetorical, structuralist, and text-linguistic—which converge to reveal various reading aesthetics in its language. These approaches stir certain questions regarding the relationship between the informative (khabar) and the performative (inshā’), the interaction between question and answer, the connection of time to space, the link between events and personages, and the harmony of grammatical cohesion and underlying coherence. Furthermore, it explores the interrelationship between situational context and intertextuality in Glorious Quran, situated in a critical movement shifting from the part to the whole, unifying numerous dualities whose unity culminates in larger, more comprehensive structures.

When reading the sayings of Imam Ali (peace be upon him), and from a psychological perspective on some of his statements , it is found that some foundations pertain to profound principles of positive psychology. These principles emphasize self-knowledge as the origin of all knowledge, disciplining the soul through piety, fear of Allah and seeking His favor, discovering one's talents to enhance self-confidence, and connecting positive thinking to behavior such as tolerance and the tireless pursuit of knowledge. They also stress hope as a driving force for success, overcoming difficulties, and enduring hardships. Such comes equal to certain concepts: gratitude, resilience, and the search for meaning, which are emphasized in modern science.
Regarding self-knowledge, the imam (peace be upon him) said: "He who knows himself has reached the ultimate goal of all knowledge." He (peace be upon him) also said about disciplining the soul and cultivating virtues: "It is only my soul that I train with piety so that it may come forth secure on the Day of Greatest Fear." And regarding positive thinking, he (peace be upon him) said: "Thought is a clear mirror... Thought of goodness calls for action." These are just some of the many points he (peace be upon him) emphasized in his sayings. Therefore, the current study attempts to reach the principles and topics of positive psychology, which is the latest wave in psychology globally, as mentioned in many of the sayings and aphorisms of Imam Ali, by employing the content analysis methodology.

This research presents a semiotic- interpretive analysis of Seida. Fatimah al-Zahraa’s (p.b.u.h.) discourse, as exemplified by her sermon. It treats the sermon as a symbolic text that transcends its immediate historical context, expanding into open interpretive horizons across centuries. The study explores the semiotic structure of the discourse, emphasizing the deployment of signs and symbols : inheritance, Fadak, and Wisdom Day, as semantic mediators that unveil issues of authority, legitimacy, and justice. Furthermore, the paper examines the mechanisms of reception in their historical framework, illustrating how the meanings of the sermon were subsequently reproduced in the context of (the state of being oppressed). It also highlights contemporary interpretations of the sermon, particularly regarding the issues and social justice of the women, where the text is read today as a paradigm of resistance feminist discourse. The semiotic-interpretive approach was adopted, as the research combines text analysis and interpretation to reveal the impact of the sermon on shaping the consciousness of individuals and groups, considering it as an open protest text that transcends time.

The current research paper examines directive discourse as a distinct form among the diverse rhetorical modes present in the sermons of Imam al-Hasan’s (peace be upon him) . The effectiveness of this discourse lies in its capacity to facilitate communicative and informative processes to achieve impactful execution and implementation. This is due to its inherent connection to goal-oriented intent and the persuasive authority deployed for the collective benefit of the interlocutors. Such dynamics are clearly manifested in the his confrontations with the army of Mu'awiyah, his exhortations to Jihad, and his reminders of divine commands and prohibitions. To uncover the manifestations of this discourse, the study employs a descriptive-analytical approach, reviewing the various mechanisms utilized in these sermons and their functional diversity.

This study examines the dynamic wording and meaning in the Qur’an as reflected in the discourse of Imam al-Husayn during the period from Mecca to Karbala. The research approaches his discourse as a reform-oriented and value-centered grounded in a firm Qur’anic reference framework, manifested in its linguistic and semantic structure. It aims to reveal the mechanisms through which Qur’anic expressions are employed to construct a coherent rhetorical and semantic system that integrates doctrinal depth with human and ethical dimensions.
The study adopts a descriptive-analytical methodology, drawing upon semantic and rhetorical analysis to trace the interaction between lexical form and intended meaning in the Imam’s discourse. It highlights both direct and indirect intertextual engagement with Qur’anic verses, demonstrating how Qur’anic language is recontextualized to strengthen argumentation and intensify intellectual and emotional impact on the audience. The research also considers the role of historical context and situational factors in shaping semantic orientation and lexical selection, reflecting a refined pragmatic awareness of audience and circumstance.
The findings indicate that Imam al-Husayn’s discourse does not merely cite the Qur’an, but creatively rearticulates it within a lived historical reality. Phonetic, structural, and semantic elements work together to produce persuasive and transformative communication. The study concludes that the relationship between wording and meaning in this discourse is organically integrated, characterized by precision of expression, density of implication, and profound ethical resonance, making it a distinguished model of dynamic interaction between Qur’anic text and historical context.

The present paper argues that "Parallel Phonological Construction" asserts its presence in phonological rules that are genetically determined and utilized by the innate faculty of the mind to construct language. This construction is achieved through operations of selection, merging, and transfer performed on inputs : speech sounds, syllables, and lexical items with their semantic and syntactic features. Through the outputs and their paths, the rules begin to produce and generate linguistic structures that proceed with two parallel lines: one produces a primary interpretive phonetic structure, and another that works to re-represent that interpretive structure in parallel structures. This coupling between the two lines in generating linguistic structures can be called “ parallel construction”.
By examining the representation, coupling, and interconnection in the fabric of phonological structures, this concept highlights Sibawayh’s cognitive awareness of the logic of Classical Arabic, as he explains one phonological structure through the lens of another.

This study examines persuasion as a pragmatic process shaped by the interaction between the speaker’s performance and the recipient’s perceptions. It aims to explore the linguistic, rhetorical, and argumentative mechanisms that contribute to constructing persuasive influence. The research adopts an applied approach through analyzing the discourse of Abd Allah ibn Afif al-Azdi as a model reflecting the intersection of ideological and intellectual dimensions with rhetorical expression. The study focuses on structural and semantic features, as well as the rhetorical strategies employed by the speaker in delivering his message, highlighting the role of context in shaping the horizon of reception and audience response. The findings reveal that persuasive effectiveness is not achieved solely through eloquent performance; rather, it emerges from the integration of the audience’s cognitive, psychological, and social backgrounds. Thus, persuasive discourse is understood as an interactive process based on mutual influence between speaker and recipient.

This study aims to monitor the diversity in academic critical
discourse in approaching "Heritage" across its various forms, patterns,
and genres. It examines the balance in viewing and studying heritage
by utilizing contemporary concepts, theories, and modern critical
methodologies, and taking the thirtieth issue of the peer-reviewed
journal Tasleem as a case study.
This analysis contributes to consolidating the identity of academic
criticism in the realm of modern critique. Furthermore, it challenges
the common perception that academic criticism is confined to rigid
methodological parameters that restrict the researcher or dictate strict,
predetermined paths. Such examined research papers demonstrate a
clear diversity in critical and methodological premises, approaching
various heritage corpora with an open , scholarly balanced spirit