Abstract
Background: Hypospadias is the second most common congenital malformation and may be classified according to the anatomical site of the urethral meatus: distal, which accounts for about 70-80% of all hypospadias cases, and proximal, which is rare. There are multiple surgical options for the management of hypospadias. This study covers cases of distal hypospadias with two surgical options, which are urethral advancement and glanuloplasty, and meatal advancement and glanuloplasty.
Objectives: To compare the surgical outcome and complications between urethral advancement glanuloplasty and meatal advancement glanuloplasty.
Method: Forty-three patients with distal hypospadias were included in this study; 20 of them underwent meatal advancement and glanuloplasty, and 23 underwent urethral advancement and glanuloplasty in Ghazi Al-Hariri Hospital for Surgical Specialities during the period from April 2017 to March 2020
Results: Forty-six patients, 20 of them underwent meatal advancement and glanuloplasty, and 23 underwent urethral advancement and glanuloplasty, were followed for 6 months after the operation. The mean age of the meatal advancement and glanuloplasty group at surgery was (35.5+17.31 months, which was comparable to that of the urethral advancement glanuloplasty group (37.5+14.27 months), with no significant difference. There is no significant difference between the two groups in operative time, which was 35.16+2.9 min in urethral advancement glanuloplasty and 30.72+3.2 min in meatal advancement and glanuloplasty. Six complications were reported in this study, 4 of which (2 meatal stenoses and 2 wound dehiscences) occurred in the meatal advancement and glanuloplasty group, while 2 complications (1 meatal stenosis and 1 meatal retraction) occurred in the urethral advancement glanuloplasty group.
Conclusion: Urethral advancement glanuloplasty is a safe and good alternative surgical option in the treatment of patients with distal hypospadias, especially in those with a non-mobile meatus, with the same rate of complications
Objectives: To compare the surgical outcome and complications between urethral advancement glanuloplasty and meatal advancement glanuloplasty.
Method: Forty-three patients with distal hypospadias were included in this study; 20 of them underwent meatal advancement and glanuloplasty, and 23 underwent urethral advancement and glanuloplasty in Ghazi Al-Hariri Hospital for Surgical Specialities during the period from April 2017 to March 2020
Results: Forty-six patients, 20 of them underwent meatal advancement and glanuloplasty, and 23 underwent urethral advancement and glanuloplasty, were followed for 6 months after the operation. The mean age of the meatal advancement and glanuloplasty group at surgery was (35.5+17.31 months, which was comparable to that of the urethral advancement glanuloplasty group (37.5+14.27 months), with no significant difference. There is no significant difference between the two groups in operative time, which was 35.16+2.9 min in urethral advancement glanuloplasty and 30.72+3.2 min in meatal advancement and glanuloplasty. Six complications were reported in this study, 4 of which (2 meatal stenoses and 2 wound dehiscences) occurred in the meatal advancement and glanuloplasty group, while 2 complications (1 meatal stenosis and 1 meatal retraction) occurred in the urethral advancement glanuloplasty group.
Conclusion: Urethral advancement glanuloplasty is a safe and good alternative surgical option in the treatment of patients with distal hypospadias, especially in those with a non-mobile meatus, with the same rate of complications
Keywords
complications
Congenital Malformation
Glanuloplasty
Hypospadias
Urethral advancement