political issues

Policies Building Social to Civil State in after the year 2003
Abstract
After year 2003, Iraq work on transition from the completeness state which grounded on the idea of the one party and the indivisual ruler, and on the culture of the political submission to the tyrannical indivisual and his party which work on the division of the society ethnic and cult even easy to his region and control him, there by grow in this the ethnic and nationalities a sense of community on national ownership, into another from did not know Iraq before change namely work on the building the Iraqi civil state.

Summary:
It can be said that the political crisis in Iraq is a structural crisis in the structure of political state building, but it was not only the result of the variable 9/4/2003, but it has historical extensions before the events of 2003. Indeed, the crisis included the basic functions of the nature of the value dispute between The former Iraqi opposition leaders on the mechanism or how to change the former political system in Iraq, some opposition figures from the former officers, who are mostly Arabs (Sunnis) would prefer to change from within the opposition of the opposition figures of the Arabs (Shiites) who saw it An undeclared effort by the (Sunni) forces to circumvent his privileges , The forces (Shiite) was calling for a comprehensive events change the political equation through a comprehensive uprising of laying the foundations of the equation of political democracy occupies the (Shiite) fore. It is possible to say that the political crisis in Iraq is a crisis of confidence between political forces, which is a dispute over who is entitled to take power, a crisis that has a historical extension to remove injustice and injustice on the one hand and the lack of privileges and gains of power on the other. This vision was based on the accumulation of the past from political and sectarian persecution of a large segment of the Iraqi people, which later became one of the most important dynamics of the political conflict after the variable 2003. However, these divisions quickly shifted from the political level to the grassroots level after 2003 to lead to a state of fragmentation and fragmentation of identity.
Here the administration worked to exploit and employ these differences and divisions and institutionalize the sectarian project in Iraq, represented by the political building supervised by the US administration after the invasion. And produced by this construction of structural imbalances in the structure of the political system of state was and still the most prominent manifestations of this imbalance, the emergence of blocks and parties Political struggle of a sectarian nature struggling for power under the umbrella of quotas and consensus, resulted in the absence of the role of the parliamentary opposition and the spread of corruption

The challenges of the federal system in Iraq
dr.sudad mawlood sabaa
With the combination of the dual political system in Iraq administratively which brings me Between political decentralization and decentralized administration due to political conditions Suffered by Iraq before the year 2003, it has spawned the process Complex in the political administration of the country due to several data in the introduction to her the desire of some The provinces in the transition to political decentralization, and this comes in recognition of the Iraqi decision makers lack of willingness of Iraq to move to this trade Because among the conditions of internal and external surroundings in Iraq As well as you know Iraq since 2003, and until now the attacks of elements Terrorist like many of the countries of the world, which makes the survival of Iraq under the regime of Administrative decentralization is an urgent need.

Abstract
Problematic compete Russian -American: A Study in the external political behavior towards the Arab region (the study of model Syrian case))
Ammar. Hamid yassin
The subject of competition between the major powers of the important future topics that indicate us aside from the images of international relations characterized by conflict and cooperation on the one hand, and cooperation and competition on the other hand, as far as subject in the Arab region, which is one of the world's most important regions to raise the level of interactions of different Bonsagaha, being area still governed by factors other than stable, constitute the active window to the interventions of the major powers seeking to restructure ranges geopolitical this region, according to the nature of the opportunities and risks that are available for strategic planner Russian and the US within the framework of a new geo-strategically philosophy to deal with new conflicts geographically, especially in the Arab region to post Arab spring events.
The interest in studying the phenomenon of competing Russian-American reflect us aside from the paths of international and regional relations in the Arab region, the track historical Russia's relations with the Arab region and shrinking ranges of influence and leadership role for the post-Cold War, especially after the emergence of the United States single-pole controls the management and control international and regional interactions, which prompted a shift in the orientation of the Russian Federation towards the Arab region to make a quantum leap in strategic performance that is based on recognizing the shift in the balance of world powers, and then draw the logical and rational policies to deal with it, as well as opportunities to re-activate their roles in the region Arab thus contributing in a statement competitiveness in the external political American- Russian behavior toward the Arab region as key actors in international relations.
Thus, research on the problem of US-Russian rivalry by studying the patterns of external political behavior towards the Arab region (the case study of Syria) falls within the dynamic framework of the American-Russian relations, as the two countries are influential in the interactions of the international and regional regimes, Both countries are governed by internal goals of the desire for global leadership and the promotion of internal well-being. These objectives lead to the use of different means to achieve them in the framework of mutual relations which are characterized by their respective competitiveness. In the Arab region, The rivalry between the United States of America and Russia, as well as the competition of the United States and the Russian Federation. Federalism towards the Arab region can not be reduced in one area only, and this shows us that there is a clear difference in the strategic directions of each of them towards the Arab region as a result of the collision of interests, as the Russian Federation went to the conduct of Balanced foreign policy towards the United States of America after the events of September 11, 2001, is based on strengthening the approach of independence and gaining interest by exploiting the opportunities resulting from the involvement of the United States in the events of the Arab region (the war on Iraq 2003) and intersections in US-Iranian relations Russia has the ability to present itself as a new alternative to the Arab region that can be more reliably aligned with the United States of America, which has not provided substantive solutions to many crises in the Arab region.
But this is not an indicator of the level of sophistication in the way we deal with the Arab region. Both countries are based on strategic planning calculations regarding opportunities and constraints in different regions of the world. , But what determines the nature and level of the relationship is what determines the nature of the relationship and the extent of its development, because what is interesting for the US-Russian relations is that despite the multiplicity of means and areas of competition between the two countries, but the areas of strategic influence in the world are different in shaping the orientations and visions of the two countries.

The phenomenon of migration is as old as history. It includes the various countries of the developed and developing world over the years. We note here that migration from the original lands to the alternative lands is not in all cases the result of human self-interest, but in most cases it carries the meanings of cruelty and necessity, And the nostalgia on the one hand and the problems of alienation on the other. They differed according to the nature of the intended objective through which they may be in some cases in the form of convoys for the purpose of trade, and have flourished thanks to communication technology and modern transportation.
Internal migration may occur as a result of external factors when countries are subjected to foreign occupation or economic crisis as a result of the wars and their impact on the economic conditions of the occupied country as happened to Iraq during the US occupation in 2003 and the previous economic siege and the resulting economic and political conditions very bad, Led to a large migration from Iraq, especially scientific, technical and literary competencies, including migration in the fields of scientific (medical and engineering), university professors and technical and literary expertise ... etc. As a result of the violence that accompanied the occupation and after the decline of the US promises to rebuild Iraq and achieve political and economic stability, and spread armed violence because of the security chaos, and become the scientific competencies target of this armed violence by armed groups outlawed The importance of the subject as well as previously to identify the causes of migration and its activities And driving conditions and encouraging them, as well as detect the state of jaw and jawkak affected by the immigrant.

summery
The family is the basic plant of all societies, although the ancient civilizations have confirmed and proved this issue. However, this is becoming more mature at the present time. The family is an essential source for inculcating the values and morals of each of its members. A conscious generation working to serve the common good.
The family also considers the issue of education which the individual receives and it is a reflection of the environment in which the individual is born. Awareness and education in order to achieve its main objective is to achieve the public interest.
The family is part of the most important social series, which precede the hierarchy in the establishment and existence of the state, and this is evident in the Greek proposal, and how the Greek thinkers, including Socrates, Plato and Aristotle Tales contributed to confirm this idea.
Although the introduction of thinkers is a reflection of the Greek environment, it represented a broad echo that takes into account how the family represents the most important episodes in the upbringing and education of generations.
Although the intellectuals differed in their intellectual proposal, the agreement seems clear by making the family in the first place in the education of educated generations and working on serving the state, although the state has an active contribution in that, but the family is the root of it.