Abstract
This study investigates the interplay between implicature and image schemes in a selected of ransom demands as a type of forensic text through a cognitive-pragmatic study. It focuses on how meaning is constructed through image schemas and implicatures based on Wilson and Sperber’s (2004) Relevance Theory and Johnson’s (1987) Image Schema Theory. The analysis reveals that ransom demands often rely on the FORCE image schema, reflecting the coercive nature of the texts. Strongly implicated conclusions are found to dominate these texts, indicating intentions by the writer. The study highlights the role of context in shaping meaning and interpreting underlying threats, demands, and emotional manipulation embedded in the language. The findings aim to support the understanding of forensic texts and contribute to cognitive pragmatic studies.
Keywords
cognitive pragmatics
FORCE Schema
Forensic Linguistics
Forensic Texts
Image Schema Theory
implicature
ransom demands