Abstract
Abstract:
Critics continue to refer every term to its origins and establishment. Their research remains comprehensive in its origins in history, its evolution, language, its extent to its interaction with other languages and cultures, and its compatibility with the literature of the mother tongue. Thus, poeticism has an impact on critics. However, if we read the research of any writer we find that they are standing at Aristotle, the concept of poeticism remains afloat, whether as Aristotle described it or just a breakthrough history, but the embryo was completed in the modern era and after the launch of a huge number of linguistic and formative and obstetric and transformative and semiotic studies tangled as a whole in an era in which the form is an element not an essential part, as well as a meaning or content. Structuralism can be the tool that sculpts and refined the poetry after the attention of the structuralists on the word in the individual studies and the extent of its relationship to its formation and its relationship to the construction of the sentence, that relationship, which radiates images and meanings and is derived to build another meaning, so poetry approached it as it is not interested in anything without the other, In particular, it is interested in linking the mechanism of artistic luxuries based on what dynamics the character gives to the sound as a rhythm and its relation to the dialectic - with the word as a single voice that symbolizes meaning or gives other meanings related to the rhythm of the sentence and its consistency. This connotation took on another link revealed by the hard-pressed research, not because it brought to us perceptions about the word, but because they linked the concepts and between the referee and meaning, and this link, which meant the current distances are expected in the same poetic out of the shadow of all judgments and far from all systems of disintegration or displacement or imagination made poeticism take self-autonomy in itself, so it gave special connotations to the letter when connected to the intonation or the segment to give a different meaning and uncontrolled expansion in the imagination, and that some scholars went that it can not be controled or at least approaching the symbolic control of the letter or sound. Some believed that the connotation of the sound in its production has a meaning that clears into the mind of the ear from a hymn or a tone or a clip that character gave it. Poeticism is directly related to the structure and the linguistic patterns, or closer to the prophecies of that individual from the fantasy beyond the reality or revolves around it, and creates a gap or a shift away from the origin of the word, perhaps with another language such as metaphor or assimilation, in creating a displacement puts the structure away from its origin, although it is clear that it completeness of meaning does not indicate its original meaning, for example the cheek is like flowers, gives another impression between two similar things, displaced by the thought of the recipient after a large displacement breathed by the speaker and coexist with his charms perceptions of beautiful colors taken between the cheek and flowers. This shift is adopted by the poerty to create a gap or distance of tension as a part of a experience in which the human lived and a part takes him to another world of imagination to create and bring all the roses to match the visual cheek. Some critics and writers believe that the Arabs did not understand the definition of poetry by Aristotle in the sense that he intended in his study, not that poetry is a hollow weight, as critics used to express it, for example, Taha Hussein in his definition of the literature of Al-Jahiz and his eloquence that Al-Jahez did not understand the translation of Aristotle's poetry or its connotations and the extent of his relationship with the connection of music with the rhyme and the extent of their relationship in the sense, that is it is not that the music of the ear is sensitive to because it came in style in the melody with the unity of the poem, if there was a defect or shift in it, the tones are continuous as seen by the Arabs and confirmed by studies presented by Mohamed Mandour at the British Institute of Music on the poem that the pattern is not affect by the shift that turned around fa’ulan to fa’ul 5/5 to 5 / and that tone jumps to the next without sensing the ear that there is something deleted, so Taha Hussein believes that Al-Jahaz despite his definition and the statement of poetry could not understand Aristotle in defining the poetry, either because the translation in time lacked literary translation, and was limited to just words, or that Aljahiz originally knowledge of poetry did not reach his mind in the sense that links the technical relationship with each other and not poetry is balanced While some critics and scholars believe that the Arab philosophers and after th
Critics continue to refer every term to its origins and establishment. Their research remains comprehensive in its origins in history, its evolution, language, its extent to its interaction with other languages and cultures, and its compatibility with the literature of the mother tongue. Thus, poeticism has an impact on critics. However, if we read the research of any writer we find that they are standing at Aristotle, the concept of poeticism remains afloat, whether as Aristotle described it or just a breakthrough history, but the embryo was completed in the modern era and after the launch of a huge number of linguistic and formative and obstetric and transformative and semiotic studies tangled as a whole in an era in which the form is an element not an essential part, as well as a meaning or content. Structuralism can be the tool that sculpts and refined the poetry after the attention of the structuralists on the word in the individual studies and the extent of its relationship to its formation and its relationship to the construction of the sentence, that relationship, which radiates images and meanings and is derived to build another meaning, so poetry approached it as it is not interested in anything without the other, In particular, it is interested in linking the mechanism of artistic luxuries based on what dynamics the character gives to the sound as a rhythm and its relation to the dialectic - with the word as a single voice that symbolizes meaning or gives other meanings related to the rhythm of the sentence and its consistency. This connotation took on another link revealed by the hard-pressed research, not because it brought to us perceptions about the word, but because they linked the concepts and between the referee and meaning, and this link, which meant the current distances are expected in the same poetic out of the shadow of all judgments and far from all systems of disintegration or displacement or imagination made poeticism take self-autonomy in itself, so it gave special connotations to the letter when connected to the intonation or the segment to give a different meaning and uncontrolled expansion in the imagination, and that some scholars went that it can not be controled or at least approaching the symbolic control of the letter or sound. Some believed that the connotation of the sound in its production has a meaning that clears into the mind of the ear from a hymn or a tone or a clip that character gave it. Poeticism is directly related to the structure and the linguistic patterns, or closer to the prophecies of that individual from the fantasy beyond the reality or revolves around it, and creates a gap or a shift away from the origin of the word, perhaps with another language such as metaphor or assimilation, in creating a displacement puts the structure away from its origin, although it is clear that it completeness of meaning does not indicate its original meaning, for example the cheek is like flowers, gives another impression between two similar things, displaced by the thought of the recipient after a large displacement breathed by the speaker and coexist with his charms perceptions of beautiful colors taken between the cheek and flowers. This shift is adopted by the poerty to create a gap or distance of tension as a part of a experience in which the human lived and a part takes him to another world of imagination to create and bring all the roses to match the visual cheek. Some critics and writers believe that the Arabs did not understand the definition of poetry by Aristotle in the sense that he intended in his study, not that poetry is a hollow weight, as critics used to express it, for example, Taha Hussein in his definition of the literature of Al-Jahiz and his eloquence that Al-Jahez did not understand the translation of Aristotle's poetry or its connotations and the extent of his relationship with the connection of music with the rhyme and the extent of their relationship in the sense, that is it is not that the music of the ear is sensitive to because it came in style in the melody with the unity of the poem, if there was a defect or shift in it, the tones are continuous as seen by the Arabs and confirmed by studies presented by Mohamed Mandour at the British Institute of Music on the poem that the pattern is not affect by the shift that turned around fa’ulan to fa’ul 5/5 to 5 / and that tone jumps to the next without sensing the ear that there is something deleted, so Taha Hussein believes that Al-Jahaz despite his definition and the statement of poetry could not understand Aristotle in defining the poetry, either because the translation in time lacked literary translation, and was limited to just words, or that Aljahiz originally knowledge of poetry did not reach his mind in the sense that links the technical relationship with each other and not poetry is balanced While some critics and scholars believe that the Arab philosophers and after th