Abstract
The traffic surveillance system is a type of intelligent system of
traffic control. Traffic control provides solutions to most problems faced by
people. It helps to monitor, detect traffic congestion and traffic accidents. As
science evolved, it became possible to control traffic using video surveillance.
Video surveillance is the most economical option that does not involve high
costs or changes in infrastructure. Vehicle detection is one of the main parts of
the traffic surveillance system. In this paper, vehicles will be detected using two
different artificial intelligence methods (the YOLO method and the HAAR
cascade classifier method). The first one is smarter than the second method, and
both of them contain machine learning. The first processing step will read the
video. Then vehicle detection algorithms are applied using two different ways.
The comparison between them depends on the results to find the most effective
and applicable vehicle detection method. After implementing the two methods,
results were obtained using YOLO, that the accuracy is 91.31% and the error
rate is 8.69%, in time 10 sec. As for using the XML (HAAR cascade classifier
method) method, the accuracy is 86.9%, the quality is 86.9%, completeness is
90.9%, and the error rate is 13%, in time 17 sec. Thus, we conclude that the
YOLO method has better results than the second method.
traffic control. Traffic control provides solutions to most problems faced by
people. It helps to monitor, detect traffic congestion and traffic accidents. As
science evolved, it became possible to control traffic using video surveillance.
Video surveillance is the most economical option that does not involve high
costs or changes in infrastructure. Vehicle detection is one of the main parts of
the traffic surveillance system. In this paper, vehicles will be detected using two
different artificial intelligence methods (the YOLO method and the HAAR
cascade classifier method). The first one is smarter than the second method, and
both of them contain machine learning. The first processing step will read the
video. Then vehicle detection algorithms are applied using two different ways.
The comparison between them depends on the results to find the most effective
and applicable vehicle detection method. After implementing the two methods,
results were obtained using YOLO, that the accuracy is 91.31% and the error
rate is 8.69%, in time 10 sec. As for using the XML (HAAR cascade classifier
method) method, the accuracy is 86.9%, the quality is 86.9%, completeness is
90.9%, and the error rate is 13%, in time 17 sec. Thus, we conclude that the
YOLO method has better results than the second method.
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning