AL-Mawrid Journal

Indirect verbal verbs are among the pillars of deliberative research, as they search for an achievement power that is different from what the speaker intended in the apparent sense of the word. Sibawayh was not concerned with searching for superficial or deep language structures, or for independent grammatical structures. Rather, the matter is related to vocabularies that can only be determined by revealing the contexts in which these utterances appear; Because speech is only said to produce an action, and this is only in words said in a position that the addressee understands and deduces from it meaning through non-verbal inferences.

The one who studies lexical theorizing books will understand the issue of meaning in abundance. But these theories live in what the lexicographer needs when constructing the lexicon, as if they are instructions and advice for those who want to compose his lexicon. This is contrary to what I sing today in these pages, and this is what prompted me to decipher some of the ambiguity with these few lines, titled: ((The function of the dictionary in clarifying the meaning is a descriptive study)).
The intent of descriptiveness is that I do not acknowledge starting from the idea of the mechanisms of completing meaning before composing to its complete form in the lexicon. Rather, I acknowledge starting from the complete meaning that it presented, and the dictionary presents it to its reader, so the study was descriptive; To start with the complete lexical body; Until the extent of this study reached that the meaning carried by the lexicon is either: (single or plural) they live with each other as the old meaning lived side by side with the new meaning within the two spaces of significance, and the lexicon.

Sheikh Al-Qarafi adopted the general rules of logical thought in his book ‘Alkhasa’as to defend the grammatical characteristics he adopts to intentionally misspell the grammarians based on those logical rules. In this era, grammar is mixed with logic until the pronunciation and terminology of logic prevailed in grammar books and its explanations. It appeared clearly visible in grammar books in addition to fundamentals books which have witnessed the transfer of concepts besides the foundations between sciences, and they have been appearing every time they have the opportunity. Thus, it appeared clearly visible in their fundamentals books and then in their grammar books which were a clear reflection of the fundamentalist authorship. It is not surprising that we find that the books of the fundamentalist Sheikh Al-Qarafi are without of these introductions, this also appears in his grammatical books, and then to mix logic with grammar in the book of characteristics. So, the logical tendency becomes clear in the discussions of the grammatical issues, in which the logicians’ biography proceeded in discussing those issues.

In this research, the researcher tried to monitor some levels of receiving literary discourse from Al-Hallaj, by studying the possible horizons for interpreting the images and symbols through which he presented his experience according to specific contexts, related to the special mystical situation, and to the recipient represented by Al-Hallaj in his literature. Where Al-Hallaj’s discourse represents multiple levels, including what is familiar related to the image of Al-Hallaj, the Sheikh, the scientist, educator and guide, and another discourse that is deep in abstraction and complexity, related to the image of Al-Hallaj, the lover of the mortal in different places where he is subject to his strange and ambiguous imports and revelations.
The researcher focused on the artistic images that Al-Hallaj employed in his writings, highlighting the literary and communicative energy in these images, and his special ability to create meanings and upload them to the specifics of the mystical experience.

This research dealt with Professor Taha Al-Rawi’s study of the history of the sciences of the Noble Qur’an and the Prophet’s hadith according to a descriptive approach that shows his most prominent views in the writings of the words of the Qur’an and strange hadith since the beginning of their composition, and the most famous authors. Previous interpretations of it, such as the interpretation of Al-Zamakhshari and the interpretation of Muhammad Abdo, and he had innovative views, towards his opinion on the interpretation of the cut letters at the beginning of the surah.

The research stems from the idea that the maqamat (plu.) is not a pure narrative genre, as it contained the story and others to establish the hypothesis of what it called the (Narrative Weaving) by researching the poetic influence in the maqamat, in terms of the number of poetic texts that crowded the maqamat, and the impact of this on their size on the one hand, and from another aspect is the level of poetics that permeated the language of the text, making it closer to the cultural text in Arabic literature, which is poetry.
It then touches upon to the narrative construction in the maqamat, to find out a number of its elements and mechanisms revealing through the texts that it was what can be called a flat narration and not a complex one, as there are no more than two characters; one is central and the other is marginal, with the former always prevails in the narrative scene that it presents.
This had a clear effect in the absence of large parts of time-sustaining techniques for no simultaneous events require brining forward or deferring at the discourse level, for example.
It then deals with the narrative presence to describe the place, and finds that it did not rise to be a narrative element, as there is no difference between one place and another, and it has no impact on the construction of the event; because it appears in the initiation of the maqama (sing.) as a label to disappear after that. The same is true with the element of time, which has lost its character. The research concludes that all of this is not far from being variants of a single origin.

Abstract
This study is an attempt to read that touches upon the textual structure of the Maqamat Al-Hariri and follows its contextual architecture. It stands at expressive means that act as dominant components in the context and contribute to the interaction between the text and the significance of expression and its relationship to metaphysics that withdraw towards the reception process. Structural dominances that make the meaning fulfilled by its referential dimension outside the place of expression; To be an element of descriptive inference and the effectiveness of an operational work that undermines the meaning through structural media, through which it is transmitted to the recipient, so the research came to observe four of these structures believed to be procedural windows towards meaning and implication of narrative formation and revealing its dimensions and aesthetics.
The research came in four axes: The first focused on the dimensions of reception in the text of the Maqamah, which Hariri made one of the elements of the creative process.
While the second axis stands on the discourse of the place, it monitors the ways of its formation and its relationship to meaning, so his presence constituted an activity that contributes to the construction and stereotyping of the narrative.
Then the third axis to speak from the structure of the relationship with the Qur’anic text and its methods and functions that call for the presence of the maqam of the situation and the station of expression within the frameworks of dialogue and textual travel in the maqamah.
The fourth axis is represented by a procedure that traces the intentions of the maqam context and what the words promote to localize the semantic paths within fields that fit their topics in order to reveal the mysteries of the descriptive context.

This paper aims at spotlighting the efforts of Abi Mohammed, Al-Qasem Ibn Ali Al-Hariri—who died in 516 AH—to purify language and rectify the mistakes arising in it from ‘abnormal pronunciation’, which was widespread in the Muslim society of the 5th century (AH). Those efforts are put in their context, and this ‘abnormal pronunciation’ phenomenon, which was prevalent at the time, is investigated, with a focus on how this phenomenon emerged both among the general public as well as in elite societies, which Al-Hariri devotes his attention to. The investigation sheds light on the terms ‘elite’ and ‘general public’ and looks into Al-Hariri’s book Durratu Al-Ghawwas fi Awham Al-Khawass [The Educated Elite’s Delusions and the Deep-Sea Pearl of the Truth], examining its theme, method, and how he deals with the issues of sound structure, morphology, syntax and semantics. Finally, the investigation sheds light on the influence the book has had on critics over the centuries and gives some conclusions.

This research deals with the beneficial linguistic effort of the author of this book - the lexicon, Dr. Majid Khairallah Al-Zamili, a man concerned with Arabic, reforming and purifying it from the incorrect methods, and this research wanted to highlight the linguistic importance of this dictionary, and to show its modern usefulness in alerting to what was incorrect in terms and methods, and the materials of this book came in arranged alphabetical order. The lexicon is well arranged, and it was from the professor, the author, to mention the words of Al-Hariri, then mention those who agreed with him and those who disagreed with him, and then give his opinion after this. In this lexicon, the professor, the author, went against Al-Hariri's opinion. Because the latter was a strict puritan, while the money Dr. Al-Zamili to reject linguistic strictness in keeping with the inevitable linguistic development and gradation.
In order to familiarize the reader with this scientific impact, this research sought to present a sentence of what came in this book in the form of important points. Because the materials of this dictionary are many that do not suit this haste, with greatness and reverence for what the virtuous author has done in the articles of this dictionary in terms of useful and interesting linguistic investigation.

Al-Hariri has received the attention of scholars and researchers, especially with regard to his shrines. Therefore, in this research, the researcher was interested in collecting what is related to these shrines under the title: The Heritage Blog of Hariri’s Maqamat in the Literary Dictionary of Yaqut Al-Hamawi (626 AH), meaning (the Heritage Blog) in which he collected everything that was written about these shrines or on or in them, Because it is a very important means of highlighting the work and the attention it received in the literary and linguistic heritage, then the researcher limited the field of research to (The Dictionary of Writers, called: 'Irshad Al-Aryb 'Iilaa Merft Al-Aldyb, by Yaqut Al-Hamawi), For several things that the researcher mentions within the research, and the nature of the research required that the researcher divide it into two parts,they are:
The first section: it was devoted to (the heritage blog in the dictionary of writers), in which it dealt with the works completed on the shrines of Hariri, and according to the nature of each work.
The second section: it was devoted to (Al-Tammam for the work of Yaqoot Al-Hamawi), in which it dealt with what was absent from the lexicon of writers of scientific activities on the shrines.

The researcher dealt with Hariri's literary work and his firm literary achievement after the maqamat took over his fame, and stuck to his name, because it is a book that did not agree with a book in quality, eloquence and breadth of words, so it was closer to the miraculous. After its reputation, and the scholars poured in on its explanation, its number exceeded thirty-five commentators.
Despite the association of Al-Hariri’s name with the Maqamat, he has created in other compilations that match the Maqamat in rhetorical prowess and the breadth of the linguistic faculty. The researcher preferred to shed light on her in this research.

Al-Qasim Bin Ali Al-Hariri was best known as a writer. His (Maqamat) which became famous, spread, printed, and explained more than once, as well as linguistic compilations, the most famous of which is the book (DurratAl-Ghawas) and its explanation.
The other aspect, which is almost unknown to him, or has not been shed light on, is the poetic production, as he did not collect his poetry by himself - even if most of it was broadcast in (Al-Maqamat) - and none of the ancients did this, nor do the pioneers of our time.
And I stood in the latter on an unprecedented effort, which is a master’s thesis from Al-Azhar University, College of Arabic Language in Mansoura, discussed in the year 1441 AH / 2020 AD, its title: Poetry of Abu Muhammad Al-Qasim Bin Ali Al-Hariri (The author of the Maqamat, 516 AH), collection, documentation and study, by researcher Ahmed Mohamed Helmy Antar. In this work his owner collected the poetry of Al-Hariri transmitted in (Al-Maqamat), and in other sources of heritage, but - like any work done by a human being - it was not without illusions and confusion.
And this research has sought - with its aim and purpose - to define this scientific and academic effort, with various critical and investigative views on it, which are the views with which I want to complete this work and avoid its deficiency, and they are views by which I want to complete this work and avoid its deficiency, they are views by which I want to complete this work and avoid its deficiency, and it included the study section with its three chapters and the topics it included, including what concerns the approach followed in documentation, then the other section, which is the collected poetry, and we proved an important clarify that he missed, as well as the lack of integrity of his approach in proving sources and references.

This study attempts to define the personality of Abi Al-Khattab Al-Jabboli, as one of the most prominent poetic literary figures who lived in the fifth century AH, according to the testimony of critics of his time. Although this poet wrote his poetry in his own handwriting, and this diwan remained in circulation and known to scholars until the seventh century AH, but the hands of time played with this diwan until it was hidden from the attention of researchers for reasons known to Allah.

This is an investigation of the Orjozat of the hamza whether it is a hamzat qatae or wasl، organized by Sheikh Ismail Bin Ghunaim Al-Gawhari، in sixteen lines to show the differences and similarities between the two(hamzat Al-qatae and hamzat Al-wasl) as well as mentioning other linguistic aspects related to each.

This research deals with the study and analysis of the efforts of Dr. Abbas Hani Al-Charakh in the investigation of three books on the calligraphic fundamentals that have been lacking or defective, Dr. Al-Charakh worked on making a sequel to these books to fill the shortage in them, he relied on sources, assumptions, and books to obtain what he quoted, which could fill a deficiency and make a benefit.

This research revolves around an author whose book was attributed to others, and did not receive the attention it deserves. We tried to make known about him and his era, through what we have endeavored to obtain from the scattered information about him; Because whoever translated it did not provide detailed or accurate information about it. Perhaps it is unfortunate that the author stole one of his books, which is in fact a book that has been plagued by many problems, starting with its title and attributing it to its author, as well as its incomplete publication. Here we are trying to find out the truth of this by comparing the manuscript copies of it, the verified copy, and copying another book on a topic branching from its subject by the same author, which is still unverified.
The book is a rare masterpiece in the art of throwing. Because he absorbed his topics in a way that we find only in the works that came three centuries or more after him. As the authors tended to adopt the method of encyclopedias assimilated, they emptied everything contained in the old literature and formulated it in an integrated manner by tabulation and briefing. The importance of the book lies in this aspect to which we have referred, although we doubt it almost reaches the limits of certainty that the book did not remain as its author who lived in the fourth century AH left it, but rather what was not for the author without reference to it, but the study of the body of the book is what suggests this something as we will prove it in this research. However, these additions that were added to the book are not many, rather they are very few compared to what was included in the book in the form that its author left it on.
In addition, the keys that we relied on in this research, in addition to what we mentioned, were the historical information that belongs to the author to whom we are going to prove the attribution of the book, and the information that belongs to the owner of the copy that the two investigators adopted for the published copy, who became the author of the book and not the owner of it. What we will prove its invalidity by introducing the copyists of the other copies on which we relied mainly in this research, in addition to what was mentioned by the name of the author of the book during the body of the book itself.