Abstract
The talk in this research to clarify the nature of the view the actor in the book Sibawayh and understanding end and terms and provisions with reference to some of the views of scientists who came after him, we find the speech on the actor had started from the front pages in the book, scattering talk about it in the pages of the book in the form of irregular, according to the collapse of the meanings that aroused the attention of the author, Fenrah talking about the conditions of the act with the perpetrator reminder and feminized when talking about the character Almhbhh, but does not complete the talk about the feminization of the act of an actor, but in the second part, as well as bestowed on the actor of the doors do not have him direct relationship; they held not to do for an actor, doors are held under the title of an actor to begin doing door Atadh actor who has not done to effect (intransitive verb), ending a door actor who goes beyond the effects of three to do .... (transitive verb).
Perhaps It makes the actor throughout his speech indicates that the nature of the act is significant on the event can only be Balvaal, and that the actor mayor indispensable to speak governed in all syntactic phenomena and the idea of the worker and the applicable upon which his book.
The approach of this tab to make it have to put grammatical issues in the form of doors leading comprehensive as is evident in most Anwanat his book, including the doors and the various issues associated with the same headline Aftalt Anwanat varied between mystery and clarity, and the fee for the same approach to view terminology grammatical did not break a lot about linguistic meaning, it either goes to the description and acting as he did with the doors transitive verb and necessary under the title of the actor and the expresses the idea more than the term and use, and it appears this method is evident in the door of the actor to talk about the actor without the other, did not come to call what was termed at elders and teachers, especially teacher Hebron.
The unit did not mean much the definition of terms but what he saw as a clear representation and description as noted, did not mention the bug raise actor in his interview with him other than what we found at other grammarians, but the reader can be questioned from his words that contain mostly a hint does not permit.
The same applies with the factor lifting the actor, which is apparently factor phonetic represented in the act, it is the opinion of the public grammarians, but some of the views of individual attributed to Xaúa or Hisham or red, which says the worker moral or meaning of effectiveness, or tried to combine them such as Ibn Falah Yemen .
Speaking about his order in a sentence and its location has pointed to the inadmissibility of progress actor to do, but in need of hair and the bone of contention between the visual and Alkoviin who had authorized provided in non-hair, and on the progress of effect on the actor has praised Sibawayh this method in the language of the Arabs; for the the meaning of the statement is important, they mean his statement he says, and describes him as a good many Arabic.
He talked about the masculine and feminine and subsequent identical or lack thereof between the act and the perpetrator, and explained in more than one section of the book, what was in line with what is yet to come, and the Jazz where the two are based on the reported words of the Arabs and their accents, and stated in the verses of the Holy Quran
And approved the deletion of the actor with the survival and existence in the intention to guide evidenced by the presumption of place and context; does not delete it without the least, not as an act without an actor, and this is what the nut and Alexaii Suhayli and son lit and others.
As for the passport and an actor clause did not declare Sibawayh this, and it seems that he does not prevent its occurrence with interpretation and according to the statement of the conditions mentioned, it is what it is Albesrion It is of vision of Alkoviin likes fur and Hisham and Fox, was not it in the passport never as just Ibn Hisham and al-Suyuti.
Finally, I do not find that detectives collected and separated Grammarians the later in the door and one under the title (the door of the actor) in the book Sibawayh end the division and a description and an analysis and explanation of the provisions, but we find it does not meet the subject in one place, as stated in the search