Abstract
In this study, analysis of retaining structure by using the software PLAXIS is
adopted and the deformation that occurs in the body of the retaining structure after
applied the failure load detected; the failure loads are obtained from the series of
laboratory tests. Then, the cofferdam is modelled by using finite element code
PLAXIS.
The laboratory tests have been carried out two diaphragm cells of different width
to depth ratios, and used three different soil materials (subbase, sand passing No.4,
river sand, and clay). The analysis includes studying the effect of height, width, and
embedment depth. The input data of soils that are used in this software are getting from
these laboratory tests. The comparison is done between the deformation that is obtained
from the actual experimental and the software PLAXIS. It can be seen that the
displacement for the retaining structure place on ground surface in the laboratory test
equal to 0.00322m and the displacement that obtain from PLAXIS equal to 0.00372m,
and the displacement for retaining structure with embedment depth in laboratory test
equal to 0.00321m and the displacement from software PLAXIS equal to 0.00263m
Thus, the results from these two studies have been found closed to each other.
adopted and the deformation that occurs in the body of the retaining structure after
applied the failure load detected; the failure loads are obtained from the series of
laboratory tests. Then, the cofferdam is modelled by using finite element code
PLAXIS.
The laboratory tests have been carried out two diaphragm cells of different width
to depth ratios, and used three different soil materials (subbase, sand passing No.4,
river sand, and clay). The analysis includes studying the effect of height, width, and
embedment depth. The input data of soils that are used in this software are getting from
these laboratory tests. The comparison is done between the deformation that is obtained
from the actual experimental and the software PLAXIS. It can be seen that the
displacement for the retaining structure place on ground surface in the laboratory test
equal to 0.00322m and the displacement that obtain from PLAXIS equal to 0.00372m,
and the displacement for retaining structure with embedment depth in laboratory test
equal to 0.00321m and the displacement from software PLAXIS equal to 0.00263m
Thus, the results from these two studies have been found closed to each other.