Abstract
Three hundreds and thirty birds (Fabro) chicks were distributed
randomly on three density (10, 12 and 15)brid/m2 in the three treatment
with three replicates to each treatment. The results showed a significant
increase of the body weight for the birds in group with density of (12, 10
birds/m2) compared with the birds in other density of (15 birds/m2) As well
as body gain was not significant affected by the stocking density. A
significant reduction in feed intake for the birds in density of 15 birds/m2
compared with other density (12,10 birds/m2) and the difference between
them was not significant As well as feed efficiency was not significantly
effected by stocking densities As well as values of carcass components(
back, wings and neck) for all densities (10, 12 and 15) birds/m2. was not a
significant but there was a significant reduction in carcass components
(breast, thigh and drumstick) for the birds in density (15 birds/m2)
compared with other densities and the difference was not significant. the
results inculcated that the most affected density that with (15) birds/m2
which get more bruises and broken bones compared with other density (10,
12) birds/m2 and the different between them was not significant The results
showed the best stoking density was (12,10 birds/m2).
randomly on three density (10, 12 and 15)brid/m2 in the three treatment
with three replicates to each treatment. The results showed a significant
increase of the body weight for the birds in group with density of (12, 10
birds/m2) compared with the birds in other density of (15 birds/m2) As well
as body gain was not significant affected by the stocking density. A
significant reduction in feed intake for the birds in density of 15 birds/m2
compared with other density (12,10 birds/m2) and the difference between
them was not significant As well as feed efficiency was not significantly
effected by stocking densities As well as values of carcass components(
back, wings and neck) for all densities (10, 12 and 15) birds/m2. was not a
significant but there was a significant reduction in carcass components
(breast, thigh and drumstick) for the birds in density (15 birds/m2)
compared with other densities and the difference was not significant. the
results inculcated that the most affected density that with (15) birds/m2
which get more bruises and broken bones compared with other density (10,
12) birds/m2 and the different between them was not significant The results
showed the best stoking density was (12,10 birds/m2).
Keywords
(Stocking density
broiler)
carcass